You are here
Genetics, epigenetics and gene silencing in differentiating mammalian embryos
A highly complex pattern of differentiation involving maternal and embryonic factors characterizes the early development of mammalian embryos. These complex genetic and proteonomic patterns of early growth also involve various forms of gene silencing and tissue reprogramming. Understanding the nature of fundamental developmental events is hence essential to appreciate the significance of natural and induced forms of remodelling, damaged forms of gene expression and gene silencing during the initial stages of growth. Natural forms of remodelling include subtle genetic events involved in, for example, the changing nature of imprinting from before fertilization or the inactivation of one X chromosome in female blastocysts. Induced forms include the consequences of nuclear transfer and embryo cloning or the immediate effects of placing embryos in culture media. Animal and human studies are described in this paper, relating reprogramming to detailed embryological and clinical knowledge gained through the use of IVF, preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the establishmentin vitroof stem cells. Attention concentrates on the consequences of variations in all growth stages from the formation of oocytes, through fertilization, the differentiation of blastocysts and early haemopoietic stages in mammalian species. Unique features of gene expression or gene modification are described for each developmental stage.
Keywords: cloning, early embryogenesis, early haemopoietic stages, gene silencing, mammalian embryos, tissue reprogramming.
Section 1. Introduction
Oocytes and embryos are sensitive to various factors capable of modifying their differentiation. Some of these factors are natural, others are experimental. An early example emerged ca. 50 years ago when Conrad Waddington, then my Professor of Genetics in Edinburgh, raised the incubation temperature ofDrosophilaeggs. He obtained offspring with two legs instead of eyes, having apparently reinstated a silent gene that bred true thereafter. He coined the term epigenetics to cover genetic events determined by factors outside the genome, and named the re-awoken genearistopedia. He pondered whether a gene silent for centuries had been reactivated or a position effect related to this particular gene had been induced. Since those early days, various forms of remodelling have been widely assessed in searches for epigenetic systems and also for recent moves towards human reproductive and therapeutic cloning.
Reprogramming cells and embryos is hence a major feature of the present manuscript although relevant data are still limited. Detailed knowledge is essential to understand the basis of the proteonomic and genetic regulation of numerous tissues forming in early post-implantation embryos from oocyte to blastocyst, and is presented here in review form. The differentiation of the haemopoietic system is also discussed in this review as an example of an early-forming tissue in post-blastocyst stages. The intention of this paper is to clarify this mass of knowledge.
Section 2. Analyses on the preimplantation development of human and mouse embryos
Epigenetic and remodelling events may involve obscure proteins or carbohydrates that have not yet been traced since the necessary analytical methods are still imprecise. Others may involve large and even massive and simultaneous alterations in numerous developmental systems, such as when epigenetic changes affect single genes or enzymes and so distort normal gene control from the earliest stages of oocyte maturation and fertilization. Natural forms of reprogramming include the formation of sex-linked imprints identified in preimplantation mouse embryos, which are modified during cleavage and the formation of the blastocyst.
Section 2.1. The ovarian oocyte, fertilization and the early embryo
Extensive studies have clarified the formation and growth of ovarian follicles. Early follicles form in the ovaries of early fetuses in mice and humans and grow under the control of various factors, including the gonadotrophins. Belief over many years suggested that the oocytes and follicles formed late in gestation or soon after birth in some mammalian species. Those formed in the fetus enter a prolonged dictyate phase as they form a germinal vesicle, which is, in essence, an arrested diplotene capable of persisting for 50 years or longer in some human oocytes until the onset of ovulation and fertilization. Their prolonged existence may result in many human embryos possessing unbalanced chromosome complements, multiple nuclei, cytoplasmic fragments and other errors in early development. Such errors could arise through genetic or epigenetic errors at meiotic checkpoints, through distortions in a ‘production line’ of oocytes, or when ovarian oocytes suffer long exposures to epigenetic agents. Similar embryonic disasters are apparently rarer in mouse oocytes, perhaps due to their much shorter life span. This view of oogenesis was queried when numerous oocytes originating in adult life were discovered. They arose from dedifferentiating bone marrow cells that migrated to the ovaries, to add a further aspect of ovarian function (Johnsonet al., 2004, 2005).
Over the last decade, new approaches in proteonomics and gene transcription have revolutionized the study of embryogenesis. Earlier methods of measuring proteins or carbohydrates in various cells or tissues by means of gels or columns were reinforced by the introduction of 2‐dimensional protein assays and by the introduction of fluorescent in-situ hybridization and the use of fluorescent G protein markers. Van Blerkomet al.(1976) introduced such assays to study the changing distributions of hundreds of genes at successive developmental stages in preimplantation mouse embryos, as analyses of preimplantation embryos at the molecular level revealed global expression patterns of RNAs (Piko and Clegg, 1982) and proteins (Van Blerkomet al., 1976). Antczak and Van Blerkom (1997, 1999) also produced classic examples of proteonomics in relation to polarities in mouse and human embryos as described below.
A total of 14,000 known oocyte proteins were classified into distinct families. Moving to specific sites in ooplasm, their variations in culture included surface markers, folding and development to new shapes, juxtaposing groups, protein/ligand coupling, conserved residues, and various mutants (Thornton, 2001). Variations affected substrate specificity and catalytic residues, and frequent mutational changes involve Arg and Gly substitutions. Toxic compounds can modify each of these characteristics, and inherited variations may vary between tissues or individuals to result in modified protein structures regulating developmental or disease genes.
Earlier means of studying gene expression in early mammalian embryos measured the functions of individual genes, analysed crossover locations of related genes, studied homologues with other species or analysed mutant forms of the genes under study. Gene homologies also yielded valuable information from analyses onCaenorhabditis elegans,XenopusandDrosophila(Edwards, 2005a). Today, gene analyses have been strengthened by the acquisition of microarrays and the utilization of RNAi. Thousands of genes can be grouped into various classes or allocated to specific developmental systems such as successive waves of genetic activity during preimplantation stages (Koet al., 2005). Hamataniet al.(2003) assessed four transcription waves: in 2–4-cell stages (zygotic genome activation) perhaps determined by a maternal clock, 8‐cell stages (mid-preimplantation development), and finally in morulae and blastocysts. Each wave was soon largely down-regulated. Earlier knowledge was confirmed such as the metabolic switch from pyruvate to glucose (Leese, 1995). Differentiating mouse embryos displaying successive waves of gene activity typify the situation in cleaving embryos. Epigenetic alterations in transcription waves may be induced by nuclear transfer (NT), since genetic effects have been identified by Boianiet al.(2002) and Bortvinet al.(2003), as described below.
Analyses using RNAi are also invaluable adjuncts to the study of gene expression and function. Originally described by Fire et al. (1998), RNAi are significant controllers of gene function during development and are also invaluable for gene knock-out. Groups of genes controlling polar body extrusion, pronuclear growth and cell division were identified inC. elegansembryos between the 1–4-cell stages when hundreds of genes active in specific developmental functions were identified and classified (Sonnischen et al., 2005). Many of the identified genes had human homologues, so these data may be relevant to human embryos. This information was applied to form molecular machines coordinating the topology of this integrated network, and it identified similarities in transcription profiling in different tissues (Gunsalus et al., 2005). One model identified high densities of genes with specific functions such as ribosomes, mitochondrial systems and anaphase-promoting complexes. A second model measured genes participating in systems such as RNA/protein metabolism, while a third model on cell polarity identified all the Par proteins and a mammalian homologue of Cdc37 shuttling in and out of nuclei as polarity was established.
Section 2.2. Embryonic polarities and cleavage planes in early mammalian differentiation
The study of polarities in mouse and human embryos is currently attracting considerable attention. Body axes are clearly essential as a basis for controlled gene action and tissue differentiation. Induced genetic defects could be disastrous for the embryo and offspring, as witnessed in some anomalies of the left/right (L/R) axis in humans. The existence of polar axes was initially based on morphological evidence of germinal vesicles sited in polar positions and the extrusion of the first polar body at the animal pole. Among many attempts at clarifying the existence of embryonic axes, studies using radiolabelled proteins and RNA were inconclusive in identifying gradients in their distribution in mouse oocytes (Edwards and Sirlin, 1956). Evidence then emerged of the existence of an animal⁄vegetal axis as mouse and human oocytes initiated their formation and differentiation (Antczak and Van Blerkom, 1997; Edwards and Beard, 1997). Important roles were suggested for granulosa cells, especially those surrounding the animal pole, which seemingly inserted proteins such as leptin and STAT3 into cortical ooplasm at this pole in the formative stages of oocyte growth. Once established, these and other proteins retained their polarized positions throughout oogenesis, fertilization and early embryogenesis, and were finally confined to trophectoderm and absent from inner cell mass (ICM). Similar distributions to trophectoderm only were also detected forbax, Bclx, TGF‐2 VEGF, c‐kit and c‐erbB (EGF‐R) (Antczak and Van Blerkom, 1999).
The genestaufenhas a significant role in establishing polarities in oocytes, and BLAST searches and cDNA expressed sequence tags have confirmed homologies among humans, mice, rat andC. elegansand its role in relation to microtubules and endoplasmic reticulum in several species. A second dissimilarstaufengene has been identified in mouse and human embryos (Saunderset al., 2000). Other well-known examples of the significance of closely related gene systems involved the sixpargenes originally identified inC. elegansbut now found in several species including humans (Guo and Kemphues, 1995, 1996). Divided into two groups:par-1andpar-4in group 1 are primarily cytoplasmic whereaspar‐2, 3, 5, 6in group 2 affects spindle orientation. Weak cross-reactions occur between groups. Polarities in kinases andpargenes in somatic and germline cells inDrosophila,C. elegansandXenopusproved to be relevant to mammals, for example in relation to the PAR‐6⁄PAR‐3⁄PKC‐3 complex, which is also widely conserved (Hung and Kemphues, 1999). MARKs (MAP⁄microtubule affinity-regulating kinase) are human homologues ofpar-1and phosphorylate a repeated motif in the microtubule binding domains of Tau, MAP2 and MAP4 (Dreweset al., 1997). Their influence on microtubule binding and depolymerization resembles the regulation of microtubule dynamics inDrosophila.
Observations on developingDrosophilaoocytes by Cáceres and Nilson (2005) clarified and confirmed the studies of Antczak and Van Blerkom (1997) on the formation of polarities in mouse and human oocytes. Previous authors had revealed the asymmetric distributions ofgurkenmRNA and protein in flies and amphibians. These genes were essential in defining the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes of the embryo, and Cáceres and Nilson (2005) showed how nurse cells, and not the oocyte, inserted gurken protein into ooplasm at the correct polarized point in theDrosophilaoocyte.
Another approach to studying mammalian embryos involves the formation and function of various axes, although there is no direct information on their genetic control. Their expression in oocytes and early embryos could dictate the physical characteristics of oocytes and early embryos, and the shape and size of blastomeres in cleaving embryos. Such forms of prepatterning in 1‐cell embryos, in the sense that embryonic structure was informative, were measured by Gardner (2001). When bilateral symmetries of embryo cells were measured the A/P axis was found to be orthogonal to the plane of the first cleavage division and to the embryonic/abembryonic polarity in blastocysts. Some investigators dismiss such ‘pre-programming’ events, proposing instead that polarizing systems are established post-fertilization. Consequently, fierce debates emerged regarding the induction of changed polarities at sperm entry. This topic is clearly an essential aspect of embryonic patterning. Thus, Zernicke-Goetz (2003), Gardner and Davis (2003) and Gardner (2006) insisted on the significance of pre-programming and the plane of the first cleavage division, whereas Hiragi and Solter (2004, 2005) suggest that polar axes are determined by the topology of the two pronuclei and the shape of the zona pellucida. A third approach suggests that human ooplasm rotates after ovulation, enabling it arrange itself with a polarity synchronous with the point of sperm entry and driven by the sperm aster (Edwards and Beard, 1997). This situation remains to be resolved.
The fundamental gene regulating axis formation in various species isCdc42. It produces a GTPase expressed under tight spatial and temporal control, and responsive to internal and external stimuli. Regulated by downstream effectors and diverse regulators, guanine nucleotide exchange factors are stimulatory while guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors are inhibitory (Etienne-Manneville, 2004). Fundamentally a molecular switch,Cdc42regulates microtubules and responds to internal and external agents via integrins and cadherins. As yet undetected, it must be involved in the earliest stages of oogenesis and embryogenesis in mammals, although it has not been detected so far.
Emerging conflicts on the degree of differentiation in mammalian blastomeres during cleavage stages in mammalian embryos are again a matter of great significance in embryogenesis. Opinions expressed by many embryologists state that blastomeres in cleaving embryos are genetically similar and undifferentiated. This concept has now been questioned in favour of the importance of combined effects of embryonic polarities and cleavage planes in determining the fate of individual blastomeres by the 4‐cell stage.
Polarized locations of proteins and mRNAs in mammalian embryos became highly significant for early embryogenesis. These factors are distributed into 4‐cell blastomeres by maternally controlled cleavage planes during the first two cleavage divisions. A meridional first cleavage division is followed in 2‐cell stages by a second meridional division in one blastomere and an equatorial division in the other (Gulyas, 1975). This results in 4‐cell embryos possessing two blastomeres with complete A/V axes, which are possibly the precursors of ICM. The third blastomere possesses animal ooplasm only and is apparently the trophectoderm stem cell; it was later discovered to produceHCG‐β. The fourth and distant blastomeres inherit vegetal ooplasm and might be germline precursor. Therefore, there was no clear knowledge on the transmission of germplasm in early mammalian embryos as compared with other Orders. In many 4‐cell embryos, this form of cleavage also resulted in three blastomeres being linked to the polar body while the fourth lay distant, was sited at the base of the other blastomeres, and may have been germline as just discussed (Edwards and Beard, 1997, 1999; Edwards and Hansis, 2005; Hansis, this Symposium). This matter will be discussed in greater detail below.
Correlations between cleavage planes and polarities were assessed by gene markers including the transgeneCAG-CAT-2(Fujimoriet al., 2003). Independent markers identified each individual 2‐cell blastomere and revealed their derivatives were mixed randomly by day 8.5 post-coitum indicating they were equal, had mixed at random and differentiated together. In contrast, marking individual 4‐cell blastomeres revealed three distinct categories of development. One revealed random mixing, resembling the situation with 2‐cell blastomeres. The second category migrated to extra-embryonic tissues including trophoblastic giant cells and extraplacental cone, and not to the embryos proper. The third category was identified in the embryo proper and in its extra-embryonic mesoderm. Similar variations were identified in the fates of individually marked 2‐ and 4‐cell embryos. This evidence must have been determined by forms of ordered cell growth, as reported by several other workers.
As this paper was being written, Piotrowska-Nitscheet al.(2006) reported that injecting markers into single blastomeres enabled their fate in blastocysts to be determined ( Figure 1 ). Embryos where the first-dividing 2‐cell blastomere divided meridionally and the second divided transversely or obliquely produced fast-growing tissues colonizing embryonic regions of the blastocyst. This combination of cleavage divisions arose in a greater proportion of 4‐cell embryos. In contrast, the later-dividing blastomeres produced daughter cells, which congregated in abembryonic tissues. If the first-dividing blastomeres displayed an oblique or transverse cleavage, some descendants colonized abembryonic tissues, although the other blastomeres were still able to colonize embryonic tissues in blastocysts. This evidence thus agrees with that of Fujimori et al. (2003) and the earlier models of mammalian development. These data each confirm that cleavage planes are highly significant and that errors in their patterns may not necessarily lead to lethal developments in the embryo.
Among other examples of polarity detected in mouse morulae and blastocysts,Par 3induced trophectoderm cells to polarize at right angles to the blastocoelic cavity. Consequently, some inner daughter cells projected towards the blastocoel and became incorporated in ICM while the remaining outer cells remain trophectodermal. Hence, ICM cells consist of two fractions, initially from inner cells in the early embryo and later from outer cells derived from trophectoderm (Handyside and Johnson, 1978). This polarizing system fails to operate inPar3−/−mice, which inherit a reduced ICM (Plusaet al., 2005). The two ICM layers may have differing functions in development, and their isolation may help to clarify the origin and functions of embryonic stem (ES) cells.
Homologies in various species also arise in relation to the cadherin–catenin system. Cell polarity depends on cell adhesion, the cytoskeleton and signalling involving atypical protein kinase C (Izumiet al., 1998). Catenins are essential for adhesion between cells, cell shape and morphogenetic movements, and form complexes with cadherins. Mediated by the E‐cadherins and extracellular matrices,ASIPand PKCλ are essential to assemble the actin cytoskeleton and signalling networks in epithelial cells (reviewed by Eaton and Simons, 1995). Trophectoderm itself is a modified epithelium with outward-directed polarized apical domains permitting fluid transport to the blastocoelic cavity at ca. 3 days post-fertilization (Fleming and Johnson, 1988). Complexes of maternal E‐cadherin and α‐ and β‐catenin in mouse oocytes and cleaving embryos associate with cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements in cleaving embryos, and may interact with EGF‐R, a mitogen located in basal regions of epithelial cells, which concentrates and polarizes at outer cell surfaces in 8‐cell stages and at apical cell surfaces in morulae (Wileyet al., 1992; Ohsugiet al., 1996). These interactions persist into trophectoderm, to regulate compaction and cell polarization (Fleminget al., 1991; Eaton and Symons, 1995; Ohsugiet al., 1996). The role of cadherins in establishing polarities will be discussed below.
Vinotet al.(2004) recently described another polarized situation in murine oocytes whereby two activePAR6genes were polarized on the metaphase‐1 spindle. Surprisingly, these authors failed to quote earlier and relevant works of Antczak and van Blerkom (1997) and Edwards and Beard (1997).
Section 3. Imprinting syndromes
Another major area of embryonic development that is full of gene silencing and other major epigenetic effects concerns the imposition of imprints on gametes and preimplantation embryos. These were first identified some 20 years ago, and have since attracted immense attention (see Suraniet al., 1990; Reik and Walter, 2001). They involve major genetic changes leading to gene activation or silencing and to the reprogramming of embryo cells. Imprints can be characteristic of particular alleles in males and females, characterize male and female gametes, and emerge in cells specializing also germline or stem cells. Specific genes expressed in embryos may hence be derived from one maternal or paternal allele or both. Peg3, for example, is expressed paternally in transgenic mice, and is regulated by elements lying some distance away on the genome, which interact with a responder sequence in the gene (Szetoet al., 2004). Closely timed and regulated, the actions of such genes can be reversed, e.g. in germline precursors. Correct imprinting is essential since lethality or abnormality can arise through errors or mutations in mouse and possibly human embryos involving allele-specific imprints leading to the human Prader–Willi syndrome. A human global maternal-effect mutation has recently been identified, which disrupts all normal maternal imprints that assume a paternal pattern (Judsonet al., 2002). Afflicted embryos resemble the androgenetic complete hydatidiform mole.
Grafting nuclei or pronuclei into oocytes was among the early findings that led to studies on gene methylation and imprinting (Reiket al., 1993). The biochemical systems involved included gene imprinting, DNA methylation, epigenesis, the suppression of ectopic genes, and the induction of differential forms of gene expression. These are each potential regulators of early forms of embryo differentiation. Genomic modifications involve parental imprinting and X inactivation. Anomalies emerging after pronuclei were exchanged between mouse eggs included a repression of transcription and the re-methylation or demethylation of individual genes. Retarded fetal growth was seemingly due to epigenetic disorders similar to those described above. Similar observations were reported in lambs and calves (Mayne and McEvoy, 1993). Parthenotes seldom grow to later embryonic stages for similar reasons, until adult parthenogenetic mice were obtained by grafting pronuclei into oocytes and modifying the expression of H19 and Igf2 (Konoet al., 2004). Other examples of the significance of epigenetic mechanisms involve hsp90 acting as a ‘capacitor’ of the evolution of morphological systems (Sollarset al., 2003), and the role of chromatin imbalance apparently affecting the expression ofKrüppel, which is normally active in the eyes ofDrosophila melanogaster. Chromatin remodelling and other strong reinforcing mechanisms can also influence the silencing of active genes and reprogramming of silent genes.
In mammalian eggs, epigenetic characteristics typify features of the two parental genomes as imprints are imposed on gametogenic cells. Differing patterns of methylation patterns are then imposed on sperm heads and on maternal and paternal pronuclei at fertilization. Some timing patterns vary in maternal and paternal pronuclei as they are imposed initially in the latter and then in the former. Hence, methylation influences paternal genomes in early pronuclear stages as compared with newly ovulated or fertilized eggs in the maternal genome at a time when sporadic defects are common (Buitinget al., 1998; El-Maarriet al., 2001; Arneyet al., 2002; Surani, 2002) ( Table 1 ). Extraneous factors can impair these developmental systems as in sheep embryos grownin vitroafter fertilizationin vivowhere the imprinting control of maternally derived Igf2r may be hypomethylated (Younget al., 2001). In mice, substances stored in ooplasm bind differentially to parental genomes, e.g. the heterochromatin-associated protein HP1b interacts with histone H3, itself methylated at lysine 9 (Bannisteret al., 2001). High concentrations of lysine 9-methylated histone H3 on oocyte chromosomes persist in unfertilized eggs and in maternal pronuclei. These events are reinforced by the methylation of stored HP1 b in ooplasm and by its exclusive and preferential binding to this pronucleus. Initial binding at the centromeres spreads to entire chromosomes between 1 and 5 h post-fertilization.
|Stage of development||Time pre‐ or post-fertilization (h)||Form of methylation and HP1b recruitment|
|Oocyte at MII||0||Methylated histone H3||−|
|Sperm entry||1–6||HP1b recruited + de-novo methylation||DNA methylation|
Biochemical aspects of imprinting have been closely investigated. Histones coat the paternal genome, which binds neither HP1b nor mtH3. Epigenetic asymmetry between the parental genomes in mouse oocytes may involve interactions between HP1b, lysine 9-methylated histone H3 and the maternal genome whereas the paternal binding of HP1b occurs in pronuclear stages (Arneyet al., 2002). This lack of paternal binding of HP1b in later pronuclear stages complies with its earlier preferential binding there immediately after fertilization (Santoset al., 2001; Arneyet al., 2002). Protected from this methylation, it may link with histone methylation organized by HP1 proteins associated with DNA methyltransferase activity (Bachmanet al., 2001). This sequence of events could explain why methylated histones and HP1 proteins help to initiate maternal imprints in the oocyte, and why most DNA methylation associates with imprinted genes arising from maternal sources (Reik and Walter, 2001). In mammalian germ cells, zygotes and early embryos, epigenetic reprogramming of the genome regulates gene functions at critical developmental stages (Hajkovaet al., 2002). Such forms of de-novo methylation in migrating primordial germ cells lead to their erasure over a 1‐day period as they enter the genital ridge. Germ cells of both sexes thus acquire similar epigenetic fates, which are then lost as these cells differentiate into male and female cells, each of which acquires specific imprints as the gametes develop. Genome-wide specific gene loci are methylated, although DNA methylation might be aberrant. Demethylation in the genome invokes epigenetic reprogramming in early embryos and primordial germ cells, in the form of many single-copy sequences acting actively and passively. Imprinted gene methylation itself is not affected in embryos; in contrast, single copied and imprinted sequences are demethylated in primordial germ cells (Laneet al., 2003). Demethylation affected Line 1 elements but not IAP (intracisternal A‐particle) elements. This procedure may prevent IAP retransposition, which is a cause of mutations, while also aiding the transgenerational inheritance of IAP epigenetic states, which may sustain heritable epimutations in neighbouring genes.
Interference with the timing or expression of methylation patterns results in anomalies of development in mammals. Various factors could be causative, leading to overgrowth in sheep fetuses after culturein vitrodue to hypomethylation of the control element of maternally imprinted Igf2r, or changed expression of imprinted H19, Grb7, Grb10 and Igf2r, and low body weight, in mouse embryos culturedin vitro(Khoslaet al., 2001). Such long-expressed concern about risks of human imprinting associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was partially confirmed when two ICSI-derived children were recently diagnosed as having Angelman's syndrome (Coxet al., 2002), a neurogenic disorder involving severe mental retardation, delayed motor development, poor balance, failure to speak and a happy disposition. Loss of functions in maternal alleles possibly arose through disomy or defective imprinting. The condition was not found in the fetal stage, nor was it expressed in the parents. One 3‐year-old girl showed delay in speaking, had poor balance, had an overall a happy personality and showed a developmental age of 18 months. She displayed macrosaemia, obesity and microbrachycephaly and a flexed arm. A strong unmethylated band and a faint methylated band were found on her chromosome 15, and also characterized exon 1 of theSNPRNgene. Normally, embryos have a methylated maternal band and unmethylated paternal band. A second child had similar developmental anomalies, her chromosome 15 having an unmethylated band on chromosome 15 identified via an SNPRN probe (Coxet al., 2002). Originally thought to be a consequence of ICSI, no such child had deleted 15q at birth, and the fact that chromosome 15 is methylated after ovulation and fertilization indicates a post zygotic epigenetic effect. Later studies identified other very rare children carrying various imprinting syndromes, indicating that this situation must be closely monitored to discover if it is aggravated by the use of assisted reproduction.
From a practical perspective, the large calf syndrome was first identified by culturing bovine embryos in media containing fetal calf serum, similar effects emerged in mouse embryos and fetuses cultured in M16 medium containing calf serum. Many embryos died by day 14 as the activity of the imprinted genesH19andIGF2declined, an upstream control gene ofH19and a non-imprinted growth factor, receptor-binding protein Grb7, were hypermethylated, and the maternally expressed growth-suppressorGrb10displayed a heightened expression (Khoslaet al., 2001). In embryos, numbers of cytoplasmic lipid droplets increased and immature mitochondria may have reduced oxygen levels. Avoiding fetal calf serum improved embryonic growth and reduced risks of large calf syndrome, and scanning electrochemical microscopy has been used to measure oxygen consumption non-invasively and detected viable embryos (Khoslaet al., 2001). So far, there have been no indications of similar effects on human embryos growingin vitro. Imprinting defects in IGFII have also been proposed as arising in the large calf syndrome, as a result of cloning or as a defect arising in the human Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (Wutzet al., 1998). Details on the methods used by investigators studying conception in cattle have been described by Hoshi (2003).
Many lessons can be learnt from the study of imprinting. Slight changes in methylation can lead to considerable effects on embryos. Clinical risks remain low at present, since these forms of epigenetic damage are very rare in human populations. Close attention will be paid to ICSI, which interferes with normal embryogenesis at the very stage when major epigenetic changes are occurring, although controlled trials have so far noted no greater risks than after IVF and possibly after natural conception.
Section 3.1. Genes involved in specific blastomeres and ICM cells during early development
Over many years, individual blastomeres in cleaving embryos, and even the component cells of the ICM, were thought to be identical and totipotent. It is now known that gene action varies between individual blastomeres in 4‐cell stages. Among the many identified genes controlling early development,Oct3/4is a major regulator, expressed in oocytes, cleavage stages and blastomeres from the initial stages of development. It is then restricted to inner cells as blastocysts differentiate and finally confined to germline in both sexes. Its quantitative expression determines the precise differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of embryonic cells. A master-regulator of pluripotency and resembling a morphogen (Niwaet al., 2000), its knock-out impairs the growth of ICM. As the blastocyst differentiates, the lineage-related differentiation of trophectoderm is regulated by genes such asCaudal-related homeobox 2 gene(Cdx2), which acts in concert withOct3/4and invokes loss-of-potency in trophectodermal cells ( Table 2 ) (Niwaet al., 2000, 2005; Tolkunovaet al., 2006). Trophoblast fails to form in knock-outCdx2−blastocysts, which develop abnormally and generate ES cells with full pluripotency; this approach has been claimed as an ethical advance in avoiding the use of blastocysts to make ES cells (Meissner and Jaenisch, 2006). In fact, it actually raises major ethical queries about the establishment and use of such debilitated ‘blastocysts’.
|A. Early cleavage, mostly maternal||Leptin, STAT3, β‐HCG, β‐LH, sHLA-G, TGFβ2, timers, polarities a|
|B. Blastocysts and implantation||LIF-R, H19, cyclin D1, integrin‐β1, FGFr1–4, ATP synthetase U6, aldose reductase, PBK1, bFGF, MAPK, placenta lactogen, ID2, MASU2, STRA13, TCF5|
a Deb et al. (2006) state that Cdx2 is also specifically expressed in mouse trophectoderm.
Moderation of promoter activity could explain varying levels of activity inOct3/4andCdx2. Their reciprocal inhibition may be an initial step in mammalian differentiation, although curiouslyCdx2becomes redundant for trophectodermal differentiation whenOct3/4is repressed. Genes such asEomesooverlap its functions, indicating thatOct4,Cdx3,EomesoandElf5are each essential for normal trophectodermal development (Rossant, 2001). PerhapsCdx2defines the separation of polar and mural trophectoderm,Eomesacts as ICM separates from trophectoderm in morulae, andElf5separates extra-embryonic ectoderm and ectoplacental cone in implanted embryos (Niwaet al., 2005). This model also indicates that extra-embryonic ectoderm instructs patterning in epiblast.
Further evidence has recently revealed howCdx2mRNA segregated near vegetal ooplasm at metaphase‐1 in mice and was then restricted mostly to a single and later-dividing 2‐cell blastomere ( Table 2 ) (Debet al., 2006). It was then expressed in two blastomeres in 4‐cell stages, being cytoplasmic in one and nuclear in the other in many embryos. In blastocysts, its presence was identified in trophectoderm and in the outer layers of ICM, which may be trophectodermal in origin. Queries about the work of Debet al.(2006) imply that evidence is conflicting and difficult to repeat. If this evidence can be confirmed, it adds further support to opinions expressed by Edwards and Beard (1997, 1999), Antczak and Van Blerkom (1997) and Hansis and Edwards (2003). Decisive evidence requires the discovery that all four trophectodermal markers, namely leptin, STAT3 and HCGβ proteins, and mRNA forCdx2are produced exclusively by one blastomere. Valuable genes to this end have been described above, and another could beGata6, a transcription factor involved in the differentiation of primitive endoderm. It is expressed at day 3.5 in the early blastocyst, again its location indicates a separation of cell types in cleaving embryos at the 16–32 cell stage (Rossantet al., 1997, 2003).
Unexpected support of gene expression in single blastomeres and ICM cells emerged from studies on the global amplification of mRNAs and quantitative high-density oligonucleotide microarray analyses. The method was based on a small number of PCR cycles followed by the linear amplification of disaggregated inner cell mass cells (Kurimotoet al., 2006). For the first time, definite but different distributions of gene markers at the single-cell level were detected among a group of apparently homogeneous cells. Two groups of cells were revealed in ICM cells from day 3 blastocysts. Active genes in one group were typical of early epiblast, while those in the second group resembled primitive endoderm. One day later, the embryos possessed two populations, which were clearly separated by their individual genetic activities. Numerous genes characteristic of either epiblast or primitive endoderm were identified and classified. Kurimotoet al.(2006) were able to identifyOct4andCdx2in single cells as the two groups were separated. One cluster of nine cells expressed the epiblast genesnanogandFgf4, in numbers as high as 1000 per cell, while the other cluster consisted of 11 cells expressing genes typical of primitive endoderm includingGata4,Gata6andcubulin, in copy numbers reaching a few hundred per cell. Cells in cluster 1 also expressed several genes known to be transcription factors (Sox2, c‐Myc, Kf2, SpiC), signal transduction factors, and apoptosis genes. Cells in cluster 2 expressed specific genes of various classes of gene, including different transcription factors (Sox17, Runx1), which were associated with specific cell-surface receptors, a basement membrane component and DNA methyl transferases. By day 4, ICM cells expressingGata4andGata6formed 57% of the disaggregated cells and expressed other markers of primitive endoderm. Some genes includingHhex and Hnfahad previously been expressed in epiblast and primitive endoderm at day 3.5 but were restricted to the latter tissue only by day 4.5. Similar findings were made for the genes active in epiblast. Kurimotoet al.(2006) conclude that morphologically indistinguishable ICM cells are following separate fates by day 3.5, and are clearly differentiating by day 4.5. They intend to trace back to earlier stages. Based on the results of previous studies, they will find trophoblastic markers and genes responsible for allocating cells to specific lineages. A similar approach to profiling single cells and involving real-time PCR-based 220-plex miRNA expression profiling to analyse microRNA expression was recently reported by Tang et al. (2006).
Trophectoderm is polarized in later embryonic stages as forecast by Edwards and Beard (1997) and Antczak and Van Blerkom (1997). A local group of its constituent cells possessed specific functions in ‘hatching’, i.e. as the embryo divested itself of its surrounding zona pellucida. This is achieved as blastocysts undergo several contractions and then ‘hatch’ from their zona pellucida through the action of ‘plump’ cells located at the vegetal pole in trophectoderm (Sathananthanet al., 2003). An enzyme produced from these cells dissolves adjacent regions of the zona pellucida and permits the embryo to escape.
Further evidence of the autonomy of single cells or localized tissues emerged from analyses on the asymmetric pattern of cells in primitive endoderm in blastocysts. Roles of the geneLefty were assessed in relation to the formation of the left–right axis in mouse embryos (Takaokaet al., 2006). Initially expressed randomly among ICM cells, it became regionalized and tilted to one side of the ICM in blastocysts as implantation approaches, and regulated the migration of dorsal visceral endoderm to the future anterior side. It is an antagonist ofNodal, which is expressed symmetrically in ICM. Takaokaet al.(2006) conclude that this form of asymmetry reveals the origin of the anterior/posterior (A/P) body axis at the peri-implantation stage. Children and adults with disorders in L/R polarity offer clear insights into damage caused by these mutations. This axis is involved in major anomalies in human embryos including primary ciliary dyskinesis, which involves four homozygous and six heterozygous mutants of the DNAH5 protein as identified by sequence analysis (Olbrichet al., 2002). The L/R axis is established in mutant mice by breaking asymmetry, establishing midline and Nodal signalling in mesoderm of the left lateral plate (Purandareet al., 2002). Disorders in these syndromes include situs inversus, among other defects in heart, neural tubes and other organs, leading to the early death of afflicted embryos. Phenotypes also include recurrent infections due to weak ciliary action in clearing mucus in patients with various disorders including Kartagener's syndrome with a randomized L/R symmetry and immobile cilia syndrome and infertility in men. A randomized L/R asymmetry could also involve secretions from mutant forms that are non-functional. Recurrent infections due to the weak ciliary clearance of mucus may be a cause of syndromes involving immotile spermatozoa in men. The randomization of their left–right (L/R) asymmetry also led to one-half of afflicted offspring inheriting situs inversus (reversed organs). Similar anomalies associated with other polar axes have not been detected as yet.
The early cleavage stages described in this section have an immense significance for the differentiation of individual blastomeres in early embryo. The distribution of ooplasm is a fundamental matter in embryogenesis, and much more study is needed to confirm the nature of disorders in embryonic and fetal polarities and the fates of individual blastomeres in embryogenesis.
Section 3.2. Does germline form in cleaving embryos in mammals?
The concept that a single blastomere in 4‐cell embryos is the germline stem cell (Edwards and Beard, 1997, 1999; Edwards and Hansis, 2005) has been strongly criticized and germline is proposed instead to differentiate from epiblast. It is essential to decide if this new concept on germline inheritance is legitimate. Germline is desperately important. Induced mutations or other forms of damage to it during cleavage stages would be transmitted to the fetus. Experience with Angelman's and Beckwith–Wiedemann syndromes indicates that epigenetic factors may be active in germline. It is interesting to note that the absence of germline factors typical of other Orders ( Table 2 A ) has led to concepts that germline reforms at post-blastocyst stages in mammals. This viewpoint was criticized by Edwards and Beard (1999) as being a most uncertain system, since germline precursors would be exposed to the massive genetic changes occurring in blastocysts including X inactivation, expansion of triplet repeats and massive waves causing alterations in gene activity.
A closer analysis of these reports from Saitoet al.(2002) and Ohinataet al.(2005) also indicates that the ‘primordial germ cells’ identified by these authors had not in fact formed from epiblast and primitive streak as claimed. This can be done by measuring the timings of these successive stages in the embryo. Assuming a 20–24 h cell cycle, cells in epiblast would require ca. two divisions to reach primitive streak ( Table 2 B ). Timings between the 4‐cell stage and posterior epiblast would require 4–5 cleavage division at 24 h apart. This seems to be a reasonable estimate. The alternative concept thus suggests that germline was inherited through one 4‐cell trophectodermal blastomere and then sustained at later stages of development byBlimp,Stellaandfragilis. This proposal obviously has to be verified.
This section has related modern knowledge on polarities and related examples of gene expression in preimplantation embryos. It reveals the delicate state of successive developmental stages, and the considerable changes that could be affected by localized epigenetic interference. The brief mention of germline inheritance via 4‐cell stages also stresses the potential epigenetic risks to mammalian fetuses.
Section 4. X inactivation: the Lyon hypothesis
An outstanding example of constant reprogramming and gene silencing is found in the inactivation of many genes on one X chromosome in female mouse embryos. Discovered by Mary Lyon in 1961, the hypothesis was named after her. Earlier forms of the Lyon Hypothesis proposed one X chromosome was inactivated to induce equivalent dosages of maternal and paternal genes at implantation (Lyon, 1961). Paternal genes in female embryos were active only briefly in blastocysts, perhaps due to the methylation of cystine residues in regulatory regions and gene promoter sites on the X chromosome, and of CpG clusters (Wolf and Migeon, 1985). Variations on this model arose in particular tissues, e.g. in one-half of brain cells, and not at all in chorionic villi. In mice, this form of inactivation began in the paternal X chromosome in trophectoderm, then in inner cell mass and finally in embryonic ectoderm. Maternal and paternal X chromosomes were inactivated at random inn cells contributing to the embryo proper. Findings were overall similar in human embryos, especially in neural tissues, while CpG repeats arose in cleaving embryos and blastocysts (Hinds et al., 1993).
Modifications in the Lyon Hypothesis arose in the 1990s. Various genes on ‘inert’ X chromosomes remained active, some of them being located adjacent to the pairing region with the Y chromosome (Brownet al., 1991). This situation meant that maternal and paternal regions remained active at particular sites along the X chromosomes. The genexist(Xi-specific transcripts) was expressed from the inactive X, was female specific and located near the centre of X inactivation. These remarkable situations may explain some characteristics typical of XO patients. It is also noteworthy that other genes are methylated in the ICM in mouse embryos but not in trophectoderm or its descendants (Kratzeret al., 1983; Singer-Samet al., 1992; Edwards and Brody, 1995).
Concepts have changed, including suggestions by Huynh and Lee (2003) that X inactivation has a much earlier onset, for example at meiosis in paternal germline, prior to fertilization or during the first transcription wave in 2‐cell embryos prior toXisttaking over. This gene produces acis-acting RNA, which recruits silencing complexes to the inactive X chromosome to maintain inactive states in related genes. Stably repressingXistrequires either DNA methylation, which occurs without DNA replication or the synthesis of RNA and protein, and precedes reprogramming andOct4transcription inXenopusoocytes by affecting its promoter (Simonsson and Gurdon, 2004), or the roles ofDnmt3aandDnmt3bin mediating the expression of the Xist promoter (Sado et al., 2004). This process of X‐inactivation silences the Xp (paternal) or Xm (maternal) chromosome at random except for extra-embryonic trophectoderm and primitive endoderm where Xp is inactivated, and may vary along the X chromosome (Mak et al., 2002). Maternal but not paternal PgK expression in cleavage stages implied that Xmand not Xpwere active; Xmwas expressed in trophoblastic stem cells along most of its length after implantation. Extensive silencing along Xp is related to a switch in Xist chromatin from an early to a later form.
Further developments in the new century led to even further refinements of the Lyon Hypothesis. Plasticity in gene silencing in mice as assessed by Huynh and Lee (2003) using aCot-1probe detected no transcription in 1‐cell stages, weak signals in 2‐cell stages and rising levels in later stages except whereXistwas active. ‘Holes’ were detected in chromosomal gene expression, and variations also arose among heterochromatic markers such aseed(embryonic ectoderm development) andenx1(enhancer of zeste). Maternal and paternal genes were expressed unequally. Repression was highest near the X‐inactivation site, and some genes includingChic1,XnpandPgkretained maternal expression. Gradients in gene silencing along chromosomes in morulae were identified among maternal transcripts forBZm,Yy1and other genes. Shifts inXistexpression from early to later forms occurred at implantation as heterochromatic factors such asEedandEnx1were recruited (Chadwick and Willard, 2003). One-fifth of blastomeres now expressed low levels ofXistor none at all, and many imprints were erased in epiblast.EedandEZh2are members of thePolycombgroup and associate with the inactive X chromosome in trophoblast stem cells. This association is stable, and may be a mechanism maintaining X inactivation in these cells (Mak et al., 2002). After X inactivation,Eedmaintains gene silencing or repression, and it also acts on imprinted loci in autosomes. Null mutants of either gene suppress development post-gastrulation as trophoblast is repressed and X inactivation fails to respond to changes in methylation status. Embryonic lineages are also regulated and timed asXistrecruits theEed/EZh2complex as a template while awaiting permanent forms of silencing.
Imprinting at day 7.5 post-coitum, for example, affected four paternally inherited and six maternally inherited genes among others that were seemingly unaffected (Ferguson-Smith and Reik, 2003). Many genes escapeEed, such as maternally expressedIgf2rand others locating on paternally inherited chromosomes, which are regulated by paternally expressed anti-sense RNA.Eedalso regulates parent-of-origin silencing via a modified form of imprinting. Some genes may escape this type of control as methylation is induced by an alternative system of modifying histones. Apparently,Eeddoes not regulate global imprinting and is involved locally in a subset of imprinted genes including Angelman's, Beckwith–Wiedemann and Prader–Willi syndromes (Mageret al., 2003). ES trophectodermal cells also undergo X inactivation during differentiation, with a shift from reversible to irreversible inactivation corresponding with a leaky silencing of in embryos before but not after implantation (Wutz and Jaenisch, 2000). A weak expression ofXistmay lead to leaky forms of silencing in the paternal X chromosome (Xp).
Mice made deficient for methyltransferase, an active component in methylation, were not prevented from the normal regulation of Xist and X inactivation (Sadoet al., 2004). This evidence is held to cast doubts on their causative role of methylation. Either other systems can regulate inactivation, or the methyltransferase gene may have to be expressed at specific stages of preimplantation development as discovered by Wutz and Jaenisch (2000) for ES cells. The possibility of changes in the expression of X inactivation led Sandoviciet al.(2004) to perform a longitudinal study on X inactivation in normal women. No differences were discovered in the activation ratio in most women, except for women aged 60 and over. This led these authors to suggest that discontinuous or catastrophic factors may be responsible as they call for further research.
These successive developments spell out a remarkable series of studies on X activation and inactivation. It is an amazing model of reprogramming, active in every embryo from its earliest developmental stages. Immense amounts of information clearly remain to be clarified and applied to knowledge on reprogramming systems.
Section 5. Epigenetic modifications in preimplantation NT embryos
Grafting somatic cell nuclei into oocytes during cloning offers an immense scope for imposing chosen characteristics on somatic and stem cells. Yet it also evokes major embryonic disasters when used to produce NT embryos in some mammalian species but not in others. Wilmutet al.(1997) discovered that NT for cloning was possible at the risk of damaged embryos and offspring in various species, and even Dolly expressed epigenetic changes. The principles underlying SCNT are shown in Figure 2 .
Section 5.1. Cloning laboratory and farm animals
Nuclear transfer using somatic cell donors (SCNT) may nevertheless have important roles in various aspects of reproductive and stem cell medicine. Reproductive cloning involves producing newborn children cloned from a donor nucleus. Therapeutic cloning is designed to produce stem cell lines identical with the nuclear donor, in case they are needed by the donor for transplantation in later life. Infertility cloning involves preparing gametes for infertile mean and women lacking their own gametes (Lacham-Kaplanet al., 2001; Nagy, 2004). Each of these approaches utilizes essentially similar techniques that are based on initial studies in mice (Tarkowski and Balakier, 1980), which are being applied in humans (Palermoet al.,2002). When these workers transferred nuclei of somatic cells into ooplasm of non-activated eggs, chromosomal condensation was premature and various structures formed in recipient oocytes, some resembling a spindle and a metaphase plate. Later studies have, overall, confirmed these results, with modified methylation in oocytes, further changes in genomic methylation, histone modifications, X chromosome inactivation, and non-coding RNA interference as closely linked genes displayed varying responses to methylation (Tesariket al., 2001; Nagy, 2004; Takeuchi and Palermo, 2004; Verdelet al., 2004).
Long experience with cloning in farm and laboratory animals revealed significant effects of the cell cycle stage in achieving successful cloning, as variable responses in cloned oocytes modified normal development in NT embryos, as reviewed by Edwards and Beard (1998).
NT may be improved by selecting the optimal stage of the cell cycle in donor nuclei. Some investigators preferred using donor nuclei in the G1/S phase whereas others used G0 nuclei as with the birth of Dolly (Cheonget al., 1993; Wilmutet al., 1997). Yet the G1 phase is short or absent in some early post-implantation stages (Pinto-Correiaet al., 1995; Kwon and Kono, 1996). Likewise, Galatet al.(2005) induced human cumulus cell nuclei to undergo haploidization by grafting them to enucleated human oocytes in metaphase 2 and then using electroactivation to induce the differentiation of the grafted oocytes at various intervals thereafter. The majority of oocytes were activated and displayed similar pronuclei derived from the donor nucleus and differing from normally fertilized eggs in their close location in ooplasm. Only 4/10 of the resulting embryos were diploid ( Table 3 ).
|Group||Interval NT to activation||Details of NT oocytes (%)|
|Normal haploid||1 error||2 errors||3 errors||Total NT|
|1||4–7||2 (11.1)||9 (50)||7 (38.9)||0||18|
|2||8–14||2 (18.2)||1 (9.0)||4 (36.4)||4 (36.4)||11|
|3||15–21||0||4 (33.3)||4 (33.3)||4 (33.3)||12|
|All groups||4–21||4 (9.8)||14 (34.1)||15 (36.6)||8 (19.5)||41|
Culture conditions, the ‘freshness’ of the recipient oocyte, the status of the cell cycle in donor nuclei and other factors influence the success of NT. Some earlier workers preferred to utilize ageing oocytes deficient in maturation promoting factor (MPF). Yet MPF is linked to the actions of histone H1 kinase activity, i.e. mos protein, on the meiotic spindle during polar body extrusion, and to the breakdown of the nuclear envelope among other effects (Collaset al., 1993; Sagata, 1997). Some investigators even recommended the use of aged MPF-deficient oocytes in NT (Pratheret al., 1987; Campbellet al., 1993). Attitudes have changed concerning human NT, since recent workers stress the significance of fresh oocytes to obtain the best results as summarized by Stojkovicet al.(2005). This team recommended using oocytes by 1 h post-collection, removing the oocyte nucleus and spindle before metaphase II arrest, avoiding human oocytes maturedin vitro, performing NT using specific approaches to spindle removal, avoiding factors in medium and improving the means of micromanipulation to achieve NT.
Specific endogenous demethylases with the dinucleotide sequence CpG modify developmental patterns by modifying DNA methylation (Ramchandaniet al., 1999). Patterns of methylation and demethylation regulating gene expression may be reversed or modified by internal and extracellular signals or through simple changes in the local environment. High degrees of methylation do not necessarily harm gene expression, and variations might accrue in the degree of methylation among linked genes. Applying NT with embryonic stem cells and cumulus cell nuclei led to anomalies in gene expression in mouse embryos that persisted until birth without undue effects on the offspring (Humpheryset al., 2001). This evidence implies that some epigenetic changes may be tolerated. NT may even be improved under abnormal forms of gene expression in donor nuclei from cumulus cells, and in mice cloned from embryonic stem cells. Some conditions of DNA methylation and histone modification seemingly invoked epigenetic changes and improved success with NT (Hochedlinger and Jaenisch, 2003).
The source of the nucleus can also influence success. For example, in clones derived from cumulus cells, three or more genes were largely silenced or expressed aberrantly, in contrast to the situation in clones derived from nuclei of primordial germ cells (Boianiet al., 2002). A faulty expression ofOct4was also found among one-third or more of the genes related toOct4expression when clones were derived from cumulus cell nuclei (Bortvinet al., 2003). In contrast, the use of ES cell nuclei resulted in the normal expression of these genes and a related improvement in embryo development to full term. Differential afflictions emerged with each of these forms of cloning in relation to several genes related toOct4that are incompletely activated after NT in mouse oocytes (Bortvinet al., 2003). Controlled methylation of some genes or histones, or natural silencing withOct4could well differ from silencing induced by NT and its complex situations.
Damage to embryos may be manifest some time after birth. For example, 12 NT male mice cloned from immature Sertoli cells grew at similar rates to controls (Ogunukiet al., 2002). Cloned offspring at birth were seemingly normal since only two serum parameters were higher in the clones as compared with controls. Yet 10 died from severe pneumonia, liver necrosis, or leukaemias by 810 days, compared with three controls, possibly due to compromised antibody production as in cloned goats (Keeferet al., 2001). Epigenetic effects were also induced in cloned embryos derived from NT in rabbits. They grew more slowly than controls, and only 15/54 embryos implanted and none survived when transferred to a host mother in synchrony with her uterine differentiation (Chesnéet al.(2003). In contrast, waiting for 22 h before transfer produced 10/27 implants and six offspring that were fully fertile, a result similar to those in normal untreated controls. Rabbit NT had proved to be highly successful, provided epigenetic effects leading to placental insufficiency were avoided.
Hiiragi and Solter (2005) recently summarized current findings on the success of NT and its problems. Overall success is low. Uncertainties as to whether reprogramming is essential were solved in studies comparing cloned nuclei from cumulus or zygote nuclei. Results were poor using nuclei from embryos in later developmental stages, which proved harder to reprogramme. Nuclei from naturally ovulated oocytes were superior to those obtained after induced ovulation. This evidence again revealed a need for a greater understanding of oocyte biology plus a need for technical improvements in NT.
Details of the responses of donated nuclei and recipient oocytes are being clarified. A study on fusing ES and somatic cells resulted in hybrid cells with 4n nuclei resembling that of ES cells (Cowanet al., 2005). Somatic nuclei were reprogrammed to an embryonic state, indicating that ES cells can modify the transcriptional state of somatic cells. Cloning oocytes may be a different matter, although grafting nuclei from cells of adult mammalian donors into amphibian oocytes reprogrammed them to produce Oct‐4, which is typical of stem cells (Byrne et al., 2003). Perhaps not surprisingly, factors such as using nuclei taken from cells in varying stages of their cell cycle can affect the success of cloning in some species. A somatic nucleus transferred into an oocyte may fail to act like a fertilizing spermatozoon. This tiny gamete possesses a very dominant anterior centriole forming a huge aster to re-establish oocyte polarities after fertilization, and this may not happen in its absence during cloning. Species variation may be significant. Mouse embryos, for example, do not have such dominant centrioles as other species. The significance of cell-cycle changes was stressed, as it affects successful cloning in some species.
Section 5.2. Epigenetic disorders in human embryos during assisted reproduction
Human embryos also respond to agents capable of inducing epigenetic changes in the embryonic genome. They may be induced by procedures commonplace in assisted reproduction. Many investigators consider the ‘simple’ matter of placing human oocytes or embryos in culture media during IVF or cloning can raise very sensitive moments for induced epigenesis. Changes in gene expression can also be induced when uncultured human stem cells are placedin vitro(Boquestet al., 2005).
Epigenetic disorders described in mice by Reiket al.(1993) have been found in rare in newborn children conceived by assisted reproduction. Primary defects apparently arise in ICM (Maheret al., 2000). Occasional examples of imprinting syndromes such as Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and Angelman's syndrome have been identified as in several children who had an unmethylated band and a weak methylated band on chromosome 15 (Coxet al., 2002). Methylated regions were also found in the chromosomal region 11p5.5 that interfered with paternalIGF2and maternalH19. NT must be improved before therapeutic cloning is possible and only after stem cell lines tolerant to a particular individual have been prepared. Greater success may be gained by NT into somatic cells. Recently, Strelchenkoet al.(2006) reported that cybrids could be constructed by transferring nuclei into enucleated somatic cells; a study is discussed in detail in this Symposium by Strelchenko and Verlinsky.
Experience with large calf and other epigenetic events in animals have alerted clinicians to potential risks to IVF and ICSI children have been mooted, based on data emerging from studies on the elevated risks of children with imprinted defects such as Beckwith–Wiedemann and Angelman's syndromes. While rare, these syndromes are unpleasant and would be best avoided. Warnings have been received from studies on farm animals, and especially the large calf syndrome.
Human NT has been very unsuccessful to date, the three published papers on human cloning having drawn similar conclusion, as embryos failed to cleave and rarely reached the blastocyst stage (Zavos, 2003; Lavoiret al., 2005; Stojkovicet al., 2005). Potential causes have been discussed extensively, including the stage of the cell cycle at nuclear transfer. Disturbed polarities may be another factor leading to embryonic anomalies although unlikely to explain why reproductive cloning in humans is so fruitless. Reproductive cloning has been achieved in members of 11 mammalian species including laboratory and farm animals although success rates were extremely low since some of them required 1000 or more attempts. Perhaps the human embryo is especially sensitive to damage and destruction. Various forms of early death in routine IVF, for example, display high frequencies of fragmented embryos and delayed cleavages. The occurrence of such conditions seems similar in human oocytes conceivedin vivothen flushed from the human female reproductive tract although data are scarce ( Table 4 ).
|Origin||No. inseminations||Ova flushed from uterus||Stage of growth and condition of the embryos|
a Data from Buster et al., Sauer et al., Formigli et al. (see Edwards and Brody, 1995).
Section 5.3. Modern views on human epigenesis
Conrad Waddington, then Professor of Animal Genetics in Edinburgh University, coined the word ‘epigenetics’ in the 1940s, outlining this new concept as ‘the interactions of genes with their environment, which bring the phenotype into being’ (Waddington, 1943). In modern terms, it refers to all stimuli affecting the actions of genes without altering their DNA sequence.
The implication of his work bears heavily today. Epigenetic changes may explain many human characteristics. These may include differences in the growth of identical twins such as recorded in the Minnesota database, since twins are exposed to different stimuli as they grow. This has been confirmed in a recent study where identical twins between the ages of 3 and 74 were examined for gene differences (Fragaet al., 2005). Epigenetic differences were rare in younger identical twins, but increased considerably by threefold or more in ageing pairs. Qiu (2006) summarizes the current situation by pointing out that cancers may arise as a consequence of epigenetic change and that recent problems with embryo stem cellsin vitrowere due to epigenetic changes involving the fusion of stem cells with others or with different cells, to produce tetraploid and other chromosomally imbalanced cells. Epigenetic codes are seemingly far more sensitive to outside influences than DNA sequences. It is also curious that the cells in the first-ever ES cell lines formed from rabbit ICM rarely displayed signs of fusion or tetraploidy (Coleet al., 1966).
The Sanger Centre in Cambridge University, UK, is studying the epigenome to identify changes to the genome arising through the actions of external factors. In epigenesis, the DNA is altered for example by methylation, which involves adding methyl groups to it. Or the surrounding histone proteins and their packaging around DNA may undergo changes in their protruding tails under the influence the structure of chromatin. The European Human Epigenome Project Consortium, founded in 2000, is the most prominent centre at the present time (Qiuet al., 2006). Debate has centred on whether to begin with studies searching for differences between eight and 10 tissues, including blood. Cells grown in a laboratory may offer another easiest approach since their genomes can be closely controlled. Large amounts of data may have to be stored and analysed to assess methylated sites in DNA, and the favourite species may be yeast, fruit fly and mice. These tasks will be very expensive.
A discussion in the ethics of reproductive cloning revealed differences of opinion on whether it should be made available even if proved to safe in later years. The relationship between this procedure and reproductive freedom was held to remain an open matter for further enquiry (Birnbacher, 2005; Strong, 2005).
Section 6. Genetics of early post-implantation stages
Section 6.1. Differentiation of embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues
Soon after the blastocyst stage, various tissues differentiate in mammalian embryos. Discussed briefly here, maternal effects are now minor as an avalanche of genes is activated in many differentiating tissues. Each stage is thus highly susceptible to epigenetic changes in gene expression, although there is insufficient data on how each tissue initiates its differentiation at this early stage of embryonic development.
Section 6.2. Embryonic and extra-embryonic development
Numerous studies have assessed the initial formation of embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues in mice as they differentiate from ICM and trophoblast during days 4–5, a stage when studies on reprogramming embryonic cells are rare. Extra-embryonic ectoderm is significant for its role in embryo patterning ( Figure 3 ). With ectoplacental cone, it differentiates from polar trophectoderm and signals to epiblast to ca. 40 founder germline cells via the synthesis ofBmp4andNodal. Some investigators suggest these cells are germline precursors based on the expression of germline markers includingTrap,fragilis,Stellaand the recently discoveredBlimp1as discussed above ( Table 5 ) (Saitouet al., 2002; Ohinataet al., 2005). Also known asPrdm1,Blimp1has significant inductive relationships with trophectoderm. It may help to initiate lineage-restricted primordial germ cell precursors in proximal posterior epiblast.
|A. Genes controlling germline in various orders|
|C. elegans||Mex-3, Par-1, Par-2|
|Drosophila||Oskar, vasa, tudor, nanos, Capucchino, spire, staufen, Germ-cell less, Pgc|
|Xenopus||X-cat2, XVLGI, Xklpl|
|Mouse||Blimp1(Prdm1), stella, fragilis|
|Blimp 1 is a transcriptional repressor involved in 20 clustered primordial germ cells from posterior epiblast; they do not repress homeobox genes as in other species (Ohinata et al., 2005).|
|B. Germline cell numbers at successive stages in mouse embryos|
|Gene or marker||Tissue with germline cells||Estimated time of development (days)||Estimated numbers of germline cells|
|4-cell stage a||Blastomere||2.0||1|
|Blimp b||Posterior epiblast||4.5||20|
|Stella/fragilis b||Late primitive streak||5.5||43|
a Data from Hansis and Edwards (2003).
b Data from Saitou et al., (2002) and Ohinata et al. (2005).
Genes determining the nature of extra-embryonic development in mice includeDp1is an essential gene sustaining the embryo, active in extra-embryonic tissues. Its inactivation leads to defects in this tissue including reduced numbers of trophoblastic giant cells and their endoduplication, fewer ectoplacental cone and chorionic cells and growth retardation (Kohnet al., 2003). MurineElf5,a transcription factor (ESE2in humans), sustains tissues derived from epiblast. Targeted mutants lack extra-embryonic ectoderm, form undersized fetuses and survive briefly and form an ectoplacental cone lacking trophoblast stem cell (Donnisonet al., 2005).
E2f1also acts at these stages, its knock-out leading to minor embryonic defects. Some of its mutants share the effects of retinoblastoma (Rb), the first known tumour suppressor gene. The retinoblastoma tumour suppressor gene (pRB) is involved in permitting entry to S phases in cell division.Rb−/−mice produce abnormal offspring, a situation long considered as due to the knock-out. Yet deeper investigations revealed that major anomalies and the death of fetusesin uteroat day 16 was due to an excess of trophoblast cells, which suppressed the normal placental transfer by decreasing blood spaces and so reducing blood flow (Wuet al., 2003). Neurological and other effects ascribed toRb−/−has thus turned out to be epigenetic defects acting through placental insufficiency (Kohnet al., 2003). They reveal that epigenesist in specific tissues may be induced by interference with closely related genetic systems in other tissues.
Section 6.3. Origins of haemopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells
This section is based on a recent review (Edwards, 2005b). It describes the early and rapid differentiation of haemopoietic and mesenchymal systems (HSC and MSC) as they establish blood cells, vasculature and endothelial tissues. Stem cells may possess a chromatin structure that is wide open and maintains multipotential that is quenched as they enter a differentiation pathway. This was revealed using analyses of oligonucleotide arrays targeted for various haemopoietic systems (Akashi et al., 2003). DNA methylation and histone deacetylation can also invoke gene silencing and the expansion of cells with phenotypes resembling HSC. Exposing human marrow cells with proliferative and phenotypic characteristics to 5‐aza 2′deoxycytidine and trichostatin A resulted in CD34+expanded cells identical to primitive HSC (Milhem et al., 2004). These cells were capable of engrafting immunodeficient mice without necessarily expressing CD34+. Such evidence hints that regulators of epigenetic systems might help to determine the fate of primitive HSCin vitro.
HSC and MSCmay differentiate from a single stem cell named the haemangioblast or the blast-forming cell (BL‐CFC), which can be isolated from primitive streak (Choiet al., 1998; Huberet al., 2004). Their angioblast potential is queried by some investigators since these cells may also form vascular smooth muscle (Emaet al., 2003). Green (2005) suggests that BL‐CFC establish haemopoiesis in yolk sac and that HSC formed in para-aortic splanchnopleure, a tissue closely associated with endothelium. They may fail to differentiate as far as lymphoid or haemopoietic stem cells (HSC).
Many reports have proposed that bone marrow cells carry progenitors for stem cells capable of colonizing and resuscitating sick recipients. The multifactorial abilities of some HSC precursor cells, perhaps angioblasts, may render them capable of forming mesenchyme cells, endothelium and perhaps other forms in addition to HSC (e.g. Kabrunet al., 1997). These HSC cells areFlk‐1+, which characterizes cells identified initially in yolk sac at day 8.5, increasing to day 10 and also expressed in fetal liver in fetuses. They are also found in cells developing from embryoid bodies, maximizing 4 days after their initial identification, producing cells with early haemopoietic potential and preceding cells with a transient wave of haemopoietic potential that express CD34+Sca‐1+AA4.1+.
Murine erythropoietic precursorsin vivoemerge on day 7–8 in yolk sac and produce primitive nucleated erythroid cells followed by haemopoietic lineages in blood islands, which colonize liver ( Table 6 ) (Wonget al., 1986). Endothelial cells may arise from angioblasts, defined as isolated mesodermal cells expressingTAL‐1 and Flk-1between days 6.5–9 (Drake and Fleming, 2000). They differ from yolk sac cells producingTAL‐1but notFlk‐1. In blood islands, haemopoietic cells expressTAL1 andnotFlk‐1, while blood vessels formTAL1+ and Flk‐1+initially, succeeded byPECAM+CD34+VE-cadherin+and then byTie2+ ( Table 7 ).TAL1is down regulated in endothelial cells of mature vessels. Haemopoiesis in mice may thus involve an initial primitive stage and then a definite stage associated with mesodermal cells expressingFlk‐1+VE−cadherin−and endothelial cells expressingFlk‐1+VE−cadherin+. Vasculogenesis may be initiated in mesoderm by cells later producing endocardium (Drake and Fleming, 2000).
|No. of progenitors per yolk sac or per embryo|
|Day 8||Day 9|
|Yolk sac||Embryo||Yolk sac||Embryo|
|Day 5 CFU-E||113 ± 26||0||1 ± 1||0|
|SBFU-E||32 ± 8||0||20||2 ± 1|
|LBFU-E||22 ± 6||0||62 ± 1||3 ± 2|
|E-mix||1 ± 1||0||32 ± 4||0|
|Non-E||10 ± 3||0||86 ± 2||1 ± 1|
Data are means ± SEM. Labels: CFU‐E: colony-forming units; SBFU‐E: small burst CG+FU; LBFU‐E: large burst CFU; E‐mix: mixtures; Non‐E: other colonies.
|Protein||Embryos day 8.2–8.3 pc||Embryos day 8.5 pc|
|Endocardium||Dorsal aorta||Lateral vascular networks||Endocardium||Dorsal aorta||Lateral vascular networks|
Later studies revealed that Flk‐1+CD41+TER119+proteins were expressed in haemopoietic subsets. Flk‐1 marks early cells and possibly the earliest haemopoietic precursors (Ferkowitz et al., 2003). CD41 discriminates the onset of primitive and definitive erythroid progenitor cells, while TER119 regulates primitive erythroblasts and erythrocytes. Flk‐1 receptor, characteristic of endothelial cells, is expressed by putative haemangioblasts characteristic of the earliest haemaopoietic cells responding to the ligand VEGF. This cell line develops through primitive erythroid lineages, and then disappears in later stages to mark the switch from embryonic to fetal haemopoiesis although endothelial cells may retain it in some haemopoietic tissues in adult life. Progressive lineage analysis has enabled plotting successive stages from ES cells to mature blood cells ( Table 8 ) (Nishikawa et al., 1998). This table shows the position of haemangioblasts, again considered as founder cells of haemopoietic cells and mesenchymal cells. Some of them identifiedin vitrowere able to respond via populations of cells expressing CD34.
|Type of cell||Characteristics|
|Proximal lateral mesoderm||Flk1+VE‐cadherin−PDGFRα− or +CD34−CD45−E‐cadherin−|
|Erythroid cell||CD45+ or Ter119+c-Kit−|
Haemangioblasts and committed angioblasts are difficult to discriminate with these markers.
Blood and endothelium were then discovered to be sustained by the murine genestem cell leukaemia(SCL), and neither differentiates in mutant forms.SCLexpression is limited, perhaps to the period when theTie2Cretransgene becomes active.SCL+/Tal‐1+ act in mesodermal cells, committing them to the initial phases of HSC formation, before V‐cadherin is expressed, and as HSC development and endothelial fate are separated (Endohet al., 2002). Recently, BL‐CFC were reported to arise from embryoid bodies at day 3, forming individual progenitors within 24 h of colony formation and becoming committed to form haemangioblasts involvingSCL/Tal‐1(D'Souzaet al., 2005).SCLis not required in later stages of HSC differentiation (D'Souzaet al., 2005; Schlaegeret al., 2005), and haemopoietic cells do not form inSCL−/−mutants where BL‐CFC produce vascular smooth muscle.SCLremains active since among its other functions, it is essential for the differentiation of primitive and definitive erythrocytes and megakaryocytes.
Other genes regulating HSC includeNotchandWnt. They stimulate self-renewal in murine HSC by inhibiting differentiation and inducing proliferation (Duncanet al., 2005).Notchis a key inhibitory factor regulating early HSC differentiation, and when down-regulated accelerates their differentiationin vitro. Its signals also maintainWntsupport for undifferentiated HSC, but neither their survival nor their entry into the cell cycle. It acts via surface receptors reactive with ligands of various gene families, releasing aNotchfragment, which enters the nucleus to associate with the transcriptional repressor CBF‐1. If expressed constitutively in HSC, immortalized murine cell lines capable of generating lymphoid and myeloid cellsin vitroare generated in long-term cell grafts. These properties involveNotchexpression in a variety of differentiating tissues.
Wntis also active in a variety of developmental systems, exerting strong regulatory influences in colon, breast, prostate and skin via catenins. It also regulates the fate of embryonic, neural, epidermal and gut epithelial stem cells, and is a major player in several forms of cancer (Duncanet al., 2005).Kruppel-like factor(EKLF) expressed in extra-embryonic mesoderm in yolk sac, especially in blood islands and then in liver, is regulated by theBMP4/Smadpathways. Related systems include the expression oflac‐2in blood islands and fetal liver, and the endogenous expression ofEKLF, which regulates haemopoiesis in specific cells from day 7.5 (Xueet al., 2004).
Similarities and differences in protein and gene expression in two classes of primary haemopoietic stem cells were recently assessed by Unwinet al.(2006) ( Table 9 ). Two-dimensional liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric assay with an isobaric covalent modification of peptides prior identified 948 proteins between long-term reconstituting haemopoietic stem cells expressing Lin−Sca+Kit+;LSK+and non-long-term reconstituting progenitor cells expressing Lin−Sca+Kit−;LSK−. A total of 145 differences were detected in the proteomes, of which 54% were extra to those identified from transcriptome analyses. Proteonomics had detected differences between the two cell lines involving proteins controlling metabolism and oxidative protection related to hypoxia and implied that LSK+cells but not LSK−cells could survive in anaerobic environments.
|Protein (iTRAQ)||mRNA (Affymetric array)|
Data presenting relative changes in mRNA concentrations for all proteins found to be differentially expressed by iTRAQ labelling in two closely related cell lines and for those displaying no differences between the two cell lines.
Section 6.4. Bone marrow stem cells
Mesenchymal stem cells form several lineages cells in bone marrow. They regulate haemopoietic cells there and modify their differentiation via the transcription factors Runx2 and PPARγ. These are driven by TAZ, a transcriptional co-activator that activates Runx2 and represses PPARγ to balance the production of osteoblasts and adipocytes (Honget al., 2005). Mesenchymal cells can be identified and separated from HSC using serum-free medium in suspension culture. Their initial exposure to stem cell factor (SCF) and interleukin 3 (IL‐3) produces CD45+haemopoietic cells and CD45−mesenchymal cells (Baksh et al., 2005). CD45− cells respond to soluble factors from CD45+ cells to induce the proliferation of CD45−CD123+CD117+cells (CD123 is the IL‐3 receptor; CD117 is the SCF receptor). CD45−CD123+cells are oestrogenic and produce 24% of the fibroblast colony-forming units (CFU‐F) and 22% of the osteoblast colony-forming units (CFU‐O). Knowledge of cytokine interrelationships between haemopoietic and mesenchymal cells should help to improve the simultaneous mass culture of these fundamental stem cells (Baksh et al., 2005).
Self-renewing angioblasts identified by Baileyet al.(2004) might be CD31 precursors for endothelial and haemopoietic cells, which display a common clonal origin after the transfer of a single cell. Marrow-derived HSC in adults could then serve as a reservoir for precursors of endothelial cells. Some multipotent cells including HSC persist in adults although they have early limits to their multipotency and do not undergo reprogramming to hepatocytes or endothelial cells according to Stadfield and Graf (2004). These investigators supported classic interpretations on developmental boundaries being established by the specific germ layers. They reported that HSC did not produce endothelial cells, a point queried by other investigators. Markers including CD34 specify cell lines with vascular endothelial cells capable of establishing short‐ or long-term recoveries after grafting (Osawaet al., 1996). Hence, multipotential mesenchymal CD14−CD34−CD35−precursors of various adult progenitor cells (MAPS) might form chrondrocytic, osteogenic and adipocytic cell lines and other tissues, as single c‐kit+Thy−1.1loLin−Sca−HSC engraft recipients except for two distinct lines that express neither Sca−or Sca+(Caoet al., 2004).
Perhaps the capacity of certain stem cells for therapeutic reprogramming has been underestimated. The most extreme example concerns the formation of oocytes after the transfer of bone marrow cells into the ovaries of recipient mice (Hubneret al., 2003; Johnsonet al., 2004, 2005). In some cases, certain genes includingZP3,synaptonemal complex(Scp3),growth differentiation factor 9(Gdf9) were not expressed in the newly produced oocytes althoughOct-3/4andstage-specific antigen(SSEA‐1) were expressed. In most cases, oocytes were normal morphologically and expressed many specific genes. Variants remain to be explained and might be determined via variations in the properties of donor bone marrow cells.
Reservations expressed about the morphology of the grafted cells seem to be unjustified since histological examination revealed the oocytes in grafted ovaries were normal. Curiously, an illustration by Pietro Motta on the normal growth of the human ovary had earlier revealed follicles surrounded by small cells that resembled embryo stem cells. This is the route that Johnsonet al.(2004, 2005) identified as the colonizing pathway. Woodburyet al.(2002) reported that germline genes were among several somatic tissues expressed in adult bone marrow cells, and Weismann (2005) recently declared that HSC were perhaps the only stem cells capable of lifelong tissue regeneration.
Section 6.5. Epigenetic changes in stem cells due to cell fusions
Many investigators now query the ultimate therapeutic potential of human stem cells since epigenetic variations arose so frequentlyin vitroin many published reports. These variations were identified on a massive scale a few years ago, and cast doubt on the value of many stem cell lines derived from haemopoietic, muscle and brain tissues. The nature of the initial epigenetic stimuli remained obscure, but later modifications involved fusions between stem cells and other cells, even ES cells, which had apparently switched themin vitroto an apparently unrelated type. This situation has clouded major aspects of stem cell therapies and possibly emerged as gene activity in transferred nuclei of stem cells was modified by somatic cell cytoplasm (Cowanet al., 2005). Somatic cells thus differentiated as their own genes were transcribed in the hybrid cells, regulated by the totipotent nucleus, which possibly lead to modifications in DNA and chromatin. Hyperacetylation at H3 and H4, and the hypermethylation of lysine 4 in H3, is associated with reprogramming. Similar effects in theOct4promoter region are associated with the activation of both somatic and reprogrammed somatic genes, although genes remain silent in both genomes in some promoter regions. This implies that reprogramming does not always lead to modified gene actions (Kimuraet al., 2004).
Much remains to be learnt about factors causing fusion (reviewed in Edwards, 2004). Mouse hepatocytes derived from bone marrowin vitrorepopulated liver corrected symptoms of disease in mutants with fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase deficiency (Wanget al., 2003). Serial transplants of these cells to later recipients revealed many repopulating hepatocytes had lost their homozygosity and were now heterozygous for alleles typical of bone marrow. Some cells were 80 XXXY (2n fused with 2n cells) and others were 120 XXXXYY (2n/4n), clear evidence of fusion. Another example concerned donor cells that were originallyRag+/+that became diluted with mutant cells and hybrids when transferred to non-irradiatedRag1−/−mice. Studies on the deletion ofFanconi anaemia gene(Fancc−/−) andFah+/+also revealed how donor cells had been transformed. Chromosome painting with FISH detected XY variants that must have arisen through fusion, forming cells now dominant in repopulated tissues. Fusion may have involved later rather than earlier stages of stem cell development, and could have been due to macrophages, and T or B cells. This work was helpful in confirming conclusions made by Lagasseet al.(2000) that fused cells may offer distinct therapeutic possibilities.
Takahashi and Yamanaka (2006) published a highly significant paper on inducing pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblasts by means of defined genetic factors. Initially, they incorporated 24 genes specifically expressed in mouse embryo stem (mES) cells into adult fibroblasts, which induced the cells to form pluripotent stem cells with specific ES cell markers and expressed similar morphology and growth properties. They then discovered that four such factors,Oct4,Sox2,c‐Myc, Klf4,were also effective, and unexpectedly thatNanogwas dispensable. They designated their cells as iPS (induced pluripotent cells), which formed chimaeras in all tissues when placed into blastocoelic cavities of host blastocysts. Transplanting iPS cells into nude mice produced tumours, a characteristic also typical of mES cells. This work clearly opens new approaches to more simple means of generating pluripotent stem cells and suggests that current techniques of preparing ES cells may become obsolete.
Section 7. Summary
This paper has described examples of reprogramming and gene modification in early mammalian embryos via methods as distant as nuclear transfers to oocytes or via innate factors such as X inactivation in female embryos. Epigenetic factors, and especially methylation, seem to be involved in distinct forms of reprogramming, especially at conception and following the transfer of somatic cell nuclei to oocytes and during X chromosome inactivation. Cell fusionsin vitroalso involve tissue stem cells and consequential effects on gene expression. Epigenetic effects on the establishment of normal embryonic polarities after NT could well be disastrous, and may be responsible for some of the fetal defects associated with disorders in establishing left⁄right polarity. Every scrap of knowledge is needed to master these techniques if therapeutic cloning is to be successfully applied in medicine or if cell remodelling is to be achieved. In a sense, discoveries outlined in this paper also make major contributions to understanding of normal development. For example, it is possible that various haemopoietic and mesenchymal tissues arise from single progenitors. The current hesitant phase in applying stem cell knowledge therapeutically will doubtless be terminated, to be replaced by the future application of individual blastomeres and the therapeutic potential of ES and other stem cells. One recent example in sheep illustrates the potential value of using ES cells committed to cardiomyogenic phenotype to a gain improvements in myocardial function (Ménardet al., 2005). Fascinating studies clearly lie ahead in the search for new clinical applications, and lack of space and time has precluded detailed attention in this review on other developmental systems, notably in the clocks timing differentiation, the power of circadian rhythms and the roles of telomeres.
- 1 Akashi K, He X, Chen J et al., 2003, Transcriptional accessibility for genes of multiple tissues and haemopoietic lineages is hierarchically controlled during early haematopoiesis. Blood 101, 383–389.
- 2 Antczak M, Van Blerkom J, 1999, Temporal and spatial effects of fragmentation in early human embryos: possible effects on developmental competence and association with the differential elimination of regulatory proteins from polarized sites. Molecular Human Reproduction 14, 429–447.
- 3 Antczak M, Van Blerkom J, 1997, Oocyte influences on early development: leptin and STAT3 are polarised in mouse and human oocytes and differentially distributed within the cells of the preimplantation embryo. Molecular Human Reproduction 3, 1067–1086.
- 4 Arney KL, Bao S, Bannister AJ et al., 2002, Histione methylation defines epigenetic asymmetry in the mouse oocyte. International Journal of Developmental Biology 46, 317–320.
- 5 Bachman KE, Rountree MR, Schulz RM, 2001, Dnmt3a and Drm13b are transcriptional repressors that exhibit unique localization properties to heterochromatin. Journal of Bioological Chemistry 276, 32282–32287.
- 6 Bailey AS, Jians G, Afentoulis M et al., 2004, Transplanted adult haematopoietic stem cells differentiate into functional endothelial cells. Blood 103, 13–19.
- 7 Baksh D, Davies JE, Zandstra PW, 2005, Soluble cross-talk between human bone marrow derived haematopoietic and mesenchymal cells enhances in vitro CFU‐F and CFU‐O growth and reveals heterogeneity in the mesenchymal progenitor compartment. Blood 106, 3012–3020.
- 8 Bannister AJ, Zegerman P, Partridge JF et al., 2001, Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on H3 by the HP1 chromic domain. Nature 410, 120–124.
- 9 Birnbacher D, 2005, Human cloning and human dignity. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 12 (Suppl. 1), 50–55.
- 10 Boiani M, Eckardt S, Scholer HR, McLaughlin KJ, 2002, Oct4 distribution and level in mouse clones: consequences for pluripotency. Genes and Development 16, 1209–1219.
- 11 Boquest AC, Shahdadfar A, Fronsdal K et al., 2005, Isolation and transcriptional profiling of purified uncultured human stromal stem cells: alteration of gene expression following in vitro cell culture. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16, 1131–1141.
- 12 Bortvin A, Eggan K, Skaletsky H et al., 2003, Incomplete reactivation of Oct‐4 related genes in mouse embryos cloned from somatic nuclei. Development 130, 1673–1680.
- 13 Brown CJ, Ballabio A, Rupert H et al., 1991, A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively form the inactive X chromosome. Nature 349, 88–44.
- 14 Buiting K, Dittrich B, Gross S et al., 1998, Sporadic imprinting defects in Prader–Willi and Angelmann syndromes: implications for imprint switch models, genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis. American Journal of Human Genetics 63, 170–180.
- 15 Byrne JA, Simonsson S, Western PS et al., 2003, Nuclei of adult mammalian cells are directly reprogrammed to oct‐4 stem cells gene expression by amphibian oocytes. Current Biology 13, 1206–1213.
- 16 Cáceres L, Nilson LA, 2005, Production of gurken in the nurse cells is sufficient for axis determination in the Drosophila oocyte. Development 132, 2345–2353.
- 17 Campbell KHS. Ritchie WH, Wilmut I, 1993, Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions during the first cell cycle of nuclear transfer reconstructed bovine embryos: implications for deoxyribonucleic acid replication and development. Biology of Reproduction 50, 933–942.
- 18 Cao YA, Wagers AJ, Beilhack A et al., 2004, Shifting foci of haematopoiesis during reconstitution from single stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101, 221–226.
- 19 Chadwick BP, Willard HF, 2003, SETting the scene: Eed-Enx1 leaves an epigenetic signature in the inactive X chromosome. Developmental Cell 4, 445–447.
- 20 Cheong H‐T, Takahashi Y, Kanagawaw, 1993, Birth of mice after transplantation of early cell-cycle stage embryonic nuclei into enucleated oocytes. Biology of Reproduction 48, 958–963.
- 21 Chesne P, Adenot PG, Viglietta C et al., 2003, Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature Biotechnology 20, 366–369.
- 22 Choi M, Kennedy M, Kazarov A et al., 1998, A common precursor for haematopoietic and endothelial stem cells. Development 125, 725–732.
- 23 Cole RJ, Edwards RG, Paul J, 1966, Cytodifferentiation and embryogenesis in cell colonies and tissue cultures derived from ova and blastocysts of the rabbit. Developmental Biology 13, 285–307.
- 24 Collas P, Sullivan EJ, Barnes FL, 1993, Histone H1 kinase activity in bovine oocytes following calcium stimulation. Molecular and Reproductive Development 34, 224–231.
- 25 Cowan CA, Atienza J, Melton DA et al., 2005, Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells after fusion with human embryonic stem cells. Science 309, 1369–1373.
- 26 Cox GF, Burger J, Lip V et al., 2002, Intracytoplasmic some injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. American Journal of Human Genetics 71, 162–164.
- 27 Deb K, Sivaguru M, Yong HY, Roberts M, 2006, Cdx2 expression and trophectoderm lineage specification in mouse embryos. Science 311, 992–996.
- 28 Donnison M, Beaton A, Davey HW et al., 2005, Loss of the extra-embryonic ectoderm in Elf5 mutants leads to defects in embryonic patterning. Development 132, 2299–2308.
- 29 Drake CJ, Fleming PA, 2000, Vasculogenesis in the day 6.5 to 9.5 mouse embryo. Blood 95, 1671–1679.
- 30 Drewes G, Ebneth A, Preuss U et al., 1997, MARK, a novel family of protein kinases that phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins and trigger microtubule disruption. Cell 89, 297–308.
- 31 D'Souza SL, Elefanty AG, Keller G, 2005, SCL/Tal‐1 is essential for haematopoietic commitment of the hemangioblast but not for its development. Blood 105, 3862–3870.
- 32 Duncan AW, Rattis FM, DiMascio L et al., 2005, Integration of Notch and Wnt signalling in haemopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nature Immunology 6, 314–322.
- 33 Eaton S, Simons K, 1995, Atypical, basal and lateral axes for epithelial polarization. Cell, 82, 5–8.
- 34 Edwards RG, 2005a, Genetics of polarity in mammalian embryos. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11, 104–114.
- 35 Edwards RG, 2005b, Changing genetic world of IVF, stem cells and PGD. C. Embryogenesis and the differentiation of the haemopoietic system. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11, 777–785.
- 36 Edwards RG, 2004, Stem cells today. B1 Bone marrow stem cells. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 160–163.
- 37 Edwards RG, Beard H, 1999, Hypothesis: sex determination and germline formation are committed at the pronuclear stage in mammalian embryos. Molecular Human Reproduction 5, 595–606.
- 38 Edwards RG, Beard HK, 1998, How identical would cloned children be? An understanding essential to the ethical debate. Human Reproduction Update 4, 789–811,
- 39 Edwards RG, Beard H, 1997, Oocyte polarity and cell determination in early mammalian embryos. Molecular Human Reproduction 3, 863–905.
- 40 Edwards RG, Brody SA, 1995, Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia.
- 41 Edwards RG, Hansis C, 2005, Initial differentiation of blastomeres in 4‐cell embryos and its significance for early embryogenesis and implantation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11, 206–218.
- 42 Edwards RG, Sirlin JL, 1956, Studies in gametogenesis, fertilization and early development in the mouse using radioactive tracers. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Naples, pp. 376–386.
- 43 El-Maarri O, Buiring K, Perry EG et al., 2001, Maternal methylation imprints on human chromosome 11 established at or around the time of fertilization. Nature Genetics 27, 341–344.
- 44 Ema M, Faloon P, Zhang WJ et al., 2003, Combinatorial effects of Flk1 and Tal1 on vascular and haematopoietic development in the mouse. Genes and Development 17, 380–393.
- 45 Endoh M, Ogawa M, Orkin S, Nishikawa S, 2002, SCL/tal-1-dependent processes determines a competence to select the definitive haemopoietic lineage prior to endothelial differentiation. EMBO Journal 21, 6700–6708.
- 46 Etienne-Manneville S, 2004, Cdc42 – the centre of polarity. Journal of Cell Science 117, 1291–1300.
- 47 Ferguson-Smith AC, Reik W, 2003, The need for Eed. Nature Genetics 33, 433–434.
- 48 Ferkowitz MJ, Starr M, Xie X et al., 2003, CD41 expression defines the onset of primitive and definitive haematopoiesis in the murine embryo. Development 130, 4393–4403.
- 49 Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK et al., 1998, Potent and specific gene interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature, 391, 806–811.
- 50 Fleming TP, Johnson MH, 1988, From egg to epithelium. Annual Review of Cell Biology 4, 459–485.
- 51 Fleming TP, Garrod DR, Elsmore AJ, 1991, Desmosome biogenesis in the mouse preimplantation embryo. Development 112, 527–539.
- 52 Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF et al., 2005, Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102, 10604–10609.
- 53 Fujimori T, Kurotaki Y, Miyazaki I, Nebeshima Y‐I, 2003, Analysis of cell lineage in two‐ and four-cell mouse embryos. Development 130, 5113–5122.
- 54 Galat V, Oren S, Rechitsky S et al., 2005, Cytogenetic analysis of human somatic cell haploidization. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10, 199–204.
- 55 Gardner RL, 2006, Weaknesses in the case against prepatterning in the mouse. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 12, 144–149.
- 56 Gardner RL, 2001, Specification of embryonic axes begins before cleavage in normal mouse development. Development 128, 839–847.
- 57 Gardner RL, Davis TJ, 2003, Is the plane of first cleavage related to the point of sperm entry in the mouse? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 157–160.
- 58 Green AR, 2005, A tale of two lineages: the origins of blood and endothelium. Blood 105, 3758.
- 59 Gulyas BJ, 1975, A re-examination of cleavage patterns in eutherian mammalian eggs: rotation of blastomere pairs during second cleavage in the rabbit. Journal of Experimental Zoology 193, 235–248.
- 60 Gunsalus KC, Ge H, Schetter AJ et al., 2005, Predictive models of molecular machines involved in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis. Nature 436, 861–865.
- 61 Guo S, Kemphues KJ, 1996, Molecular genetics of asymmetric cleavage in the early Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 6, 408–415.
- 62 Guo S, Kemphues KJ, 1995, par-1, a gene required for establishing polarity in C. elegans embryos, encodes a Ser/Thr kinase that is asymmetrically distributed. Cell 81, 611–620.
- 63 Hajkova P, Erhardt S, Lane N et al., 2002, Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mechanisms in Development 117, 15–23.
- 64 Hamatani T, Carter MS, Sharov AA, Ko MSH, 2003, Dynamics of global gene expression changes during mouse preimplantation development. Developmental Cell 6, 117–131..
- 65 Handyside AH, Johnson MH, 1978, Temporal and spatial patterns of the synthesis of tissue-specific polypeptides in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 44, 191–199.
- 66 Hansis C, Edwards RG, 2003, Cell differentiation in the preimplantation human embryo. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 215–220.
- 67 Hiiragi T, Solter D, 2005, Fatal flaws in the case for prepatterning in the mouse egg. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 12, 150–152.
- 68 Hiiragi T, Solter D, 2004, First cleavage plane of the mouse egg is not predetermined but defined by the topology of the two opposing pronuclei. Nature 430, 360–364.
- 69 Hinds HL, Ashley CT, Sutckiffe JS et al., 1993, Tissue specific expression of FMR‐1 provides evidence for a functional role in fragile X syndrome. Nature Genetics 3, 36–43.
- 70 Hochedlinger K, Jaenisch R, 2003, Nuclear transplantation, embryonic stem cells and the potential for therapy. New England Journal of Medicine 349, 275–286.
- 71 Hong J‐H, Hwang ES, McManus MT et al., 2005, TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 309, 1074–1078.
- 72 Hoshi H, 2003, In vitro production of bovine embryos and their application for embryo transfer. Theriogenology 15, 675–685.
- 73 Huber TL, Koustoff V, Fehling HJ et al., 2004, Haemangioblast commitment is initiated in the primitive stream; of the mouse embryo. Nature 432, 625–630.
- 74 Hubner K, Fuhmann G, Christensen CR et al., 2003, Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Science 300, 1252–1268.
- 75 Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H et al., 2001, Abnormal gene expression in cloned mice derived from embryonic stem cells and cumulus nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, Washington 99, 1289–1294.
- 76 Hung TJ, Kemphues KJ, 1999, PAR‐6 is a conserved PZ domain-containing protein that colocalises with PAR‐3 in C. elegans embryos. Development 126, 127–135.
- 77 Huyhn KD, Lee JT, 2003, Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Nature 426, 857–862.
- 78 Izumi Y, Hirose T, Tamai Y et al., 1998, An atypical PKC directly associates and colocalises at the epithelial tight junction with ASII, a mammalian homologue of C. elegans polarity protein PAR‐3. Journal of Cell Biology 143, 95–106.
- 79 Johnson J, Bagley J, Skaznik-Wilkiel M, 2005, Oocyte generation in adult mammalian ovaries by putative germ cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Cell 122, 303–315.
- 80 Johnson J, Canning J, Keneke T et al., 2004, Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian embryo. Nature 428, 145–150.
- 81 Judson H, Hayward BE, Sheridan E, Bonthron DT, 2002, A global disorder of imprinting in the human germline. Nature 418, 539.
- 82 Kabrun N, Bühring H‐J, Choi HK et al., 1997, FLK‐1 expression defines a population of early haematopoietic precursors. Development 124, 2039–2048.
- 83 Keefer CL, Baldassare H, Keyston B et al., 2001, Generation of dwarf goat (Capra hircus) following nuclear transfer. Biology of Reproduction 64, 849–856.
- 84 Khosla S, Dean W, Brown D et al., 2001, Culture of mouse embryos affects fetal development and the expression of imprinted genes. Biology of Reproduction 64, 918–926.
- 85 Kimura H, Tada M, Nakatsuji N, Tada T, 2004, Histone code modifications on pluripotential nuclei of reprogrammed somatic cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology 24, 5710–5720.
- 86 Ko MSH, 2005, Molecular biology of preimplantation embryos: primer for philosophical discussion. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (Suppl. 1), 80–87.
- 87 Kohn MJ, Bronson RT, Harlow et al., 2003, Dp1 required for extra-embryonic development. Development 130, 1295–1305.
- 88 Kono T, Obaya Y, Wu Q, 2004, Birth of a parthenogenetic mouse that can develop to adulthood. Nature 428, 860–864.
- 89 Kratzer PG, Chapman VM, Lambert H et al., 1983, Differences in the DNA of the inactive X chromosomes of fetal and extraembryonic tissues of mice. Cell 33, 37–42.
- 90 Kurimoto K, Yabuta Y, Ohinata Y et al., 2006, An improved single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 34 (5):e42 [e-pub ahead of print 17 March 2006; doi: 10.1093/nar/gk1050].
- 91 Lacham-Kaplan O, Daniels R, Trounson A, 2001, Fertilization of mouse oocytes using somatic cells as male germ cells. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2, 203–209.
- 92 Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalim M et al., 2000, Purified haematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vitro. Nature Medicine 6, 1229–1234.
- 93 Lane N, Dean W, Erhardt S et al., 2003, Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis 35, 88–93.
- 94 Lavoir M‐C, Weier J, Conaghan J, Pedersen R, 2005, Poor development of human nuclear transfer embryos using failed fertilized oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11, 740–744.
- 95 Leese HJ, 1995, Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Human Reproduction Update 1, 63–72.
- 96 Lyon MF, 1961, Gene action in the X‐chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373.
- 97 Mager J, Montgomery ND, de Villena FP‐M, Magnuson T, 2003, Genome imprinting regulated by the mouse polycomb group protein Eed. Nature Genetics 33, 502–507.
- 98 Maher ER, Brueton LA, Bowdin SC et al., 2000, Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome and assisted reproduction technology. Journal of Medical Genetics 40, 62–64.
- 99 Mak W, Baxter J, Silva J et al., 2002, Mitotically stable association of polycomb proteins eed and enx1 with the inactive chromosome in trophoblast stem cells. Current Biology 12, 1016–1020.
- 100 Mayne CS, McEvoy J, 1993, In vitro fertilized embryos: implications for the dairy herd. The Veterinary Annual 33, 1–4.
- 101 Meissner A, Jaenisch R, 2006, Generation of nuclear transfer-derived pluripotent ES cells from cloned Cdx-2-deficient blastocysts. Nature 439, 212–215.
- 102 Ménard C, Hagège AA, Agbulut O et al., 2005, Transplantation of cardiac-committed mouse embryonic stem cells to infarcted sheep myocardium: a preclinical study. Lancet 366, 1005–1012.
- 103 Milhem M, Mahmud N, Lavelle D et al., 2004, Modification of haemopoietic stem cell fate by 5‐aza2′deoxycytidine and trichstatin A. Blood 103, 4102–4110.
- 104 Nagy ZP, 2004, Haploidization to produce human embryos: a new frontier in micromanipulation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8, 492–495.
- 105 Nishikawa H‐I, Nishikawa S, Hirashima M, Matsuyoshi N, 1998, Progressive lineage analysis by cell sorting and culture identified FLK1+VE-cadherin+ cells at a divergent point of endothelial and haemopoietic lineages. Development 125, 1747–1757.
- 106 Niwa H, ToyookaY, Shimosato D et al., 2005, Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 123, 917–929.
- 107 Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG, 2000, Quantitative expression of Oct3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nature Genetics 24, 372–376,
- 108 Ogunuki N, Inoue K, Yamomoto Y et al., 2002, Early death of mice cloned from somatic cells. Nature Genetics 30, 253–254.
- 109 Ohinata Y, Payer B, O‐Carroll D et al., 2005, Blimp1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature 436, 207–213.
- 110 Ohsugi M, Hwang S‐Y, Butz S et al., 1996, Expression and cell membrane localization of catenins during mouse preimplantation development. Developmental Biology 206, 391–402.
- 111 Olbrich H, Häffner K, Kispert A et al., 2002, Mutations in DNAH5 cause primary ciliary dyskinesis and randomization of left-right asymmetry. Nature Genetics 30, 143–144.
- 112 Osawa M, Hanada K, Hamada K, Nakauchi H, 1996, Long-term haemopietic reconstitution by a single CD34−/low/negative haemopoietic stem cell. Science 273, 242–245.
- 113 Palermo GD, Takeuchi T, Rosenwaks Z, 2002, Oocyte-induced haploidization. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 4, 237–242.
- 114 Piko L, Clegg KB, 1982, Quantitative changes in the total RNA, total poly(A) and ribosomes in early mouse embryos. Developmental Biology 89, 362–378.
- 115 Pinto-Correia C, Long C, Chang T, Robl JM, 1995, Factors involved in nuclear reprogramming during early development in the rabbit. Molecular and Reproductive Development 40, 292–304.
- 116 Piotrowska-Nitsche K, Perea-Gomez A, Haraguchi S, Zernicke-Goetz M, 2006, Four-cell mouse blastomeres have different developmental properties. Development, in press.
- 117 Plusa B, Frankenberg S, Chalmers A et al., 2005, Down-regulation of Par 3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Journal of Cell Science 118, 505–515.
- 118 Prather RS, Sims MM, Robl JM et al., 1987, Nuclear transplantation in the bovine embryo: assessment of donor nuclei and recipient oocyte. Biology of Reproduction 41, 123–132.
- 119 Purandare SM, Ware SM, Kwan KM et al., 2002, A complex syndrome of left-right axis, central nervous system and axial skeletal defects in ZIC3 mutant mice. Development 129, 2293–2302.
- 120 Qui J, 2006, Unfinished symphony. Nature 441, 143–145.
- 121 Ramchandani S, Bhattacharya SK, Cervoni N, Szyf M, 1999, DNA methylation is a reversible biological signal. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, Washington 96, 6107–6112.
- 122 Reik W, Walter J, 2001, Evolution of imprinting mechanisms: the battle of the sexes begins in the zygote. Nature Genetics 27, 255–256.
- 123 Reik W, Römer I, Barton SC, 1993, Adult phenotype in the mouse can be affected by epigenetic events in the early embryo. Development 119, 933–942.
- 124 Rossant J, 2001, Stem cells from the mammalian blastocyst. Stem Cells 19, 477–482.
- 125 Rossant J, Papaioannou VE, 1997, The biology of embryogenesis. In: Sherman M (ed.) Concepts in Mammalian Embryogenesis. MTP Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
- 126 Rossant J, Chazoud C, Yamanaka Y, 2003, Lineage allocation and asymmetries in the early mouse embryo. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London. B. Biological Sciences 358, 1341–1348.
- 127 Sado T, Okano M, Li E, Sasaki H, 2004, De novo DNA methylation is dispensable for the initiation and propagation of X chromosome inactivation. Development 131, 975–982.
- 128 Sagata N, 1997, What does Mos do in oocytes and comatic cells? Bioessays 19, 13–21.
- 129 Saitou M, Barton SC, Surani MA, 2002, A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice. Nature 418, 293–300.
- 130 Sandovici I, Naumoa AK, Leppert M et al., 2004, A longitudinal study on the X inactivation ratio in human females. Human Genetics 115, 387–392.
- 131 Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, Dean W, 2001, Dynamic reprogramming on DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Developmental Biology 241, 172–182.
- 132 Sathananthan H, Menezes H, Gunasheela G et al., 2003, Mechanisms of human blastocyst hatching in vitro. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 7, 228–234.
- 133 Saunders PTK, Pathirana S, Maguire SM et al., 2000, Mouse staufen genes are expressed in germ cells during oogenesis and spermatogenesis. Molecular Human Reproduction 6, 983–992.
- 134 Schlaeger TM, Hanna KA, Mikkola CG et al., 2005, Tie2Cre-mediated gene ablation defines the stem cell-leukemia gene (SCL/tal1)-dependent window during haemopoietic stem-cell development. Blood 105, 3871–3874.
- 135 Simonsson S, Gurdon J, 2004, DNA methylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nature Cell Biology B, 984–990.
- 136 Singer-Sam J, Chapman V, Lebon JM, Riggs AD, 1992, Parental imprinting studies by allele-specific primer extension after PCR paternal X chromosome-linked genes are transcribed prior to preferential paternal X chromosome inactivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington 89, 10469–10473.
- 137 Sollars V, Lu X, Xiao L et al., 2003, Evidence for an epigenetic mechanism by which Hsp90 acts as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature Genetics 33, 70–74.
- 138 Sönnischen B, Koski LB, Walsh A et al., 2005, Full-genome RNAi profiling of early embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 434, 462–469
- 139 Stadfield M, Graf T, 2004, Assessing the role of haemopoietic plasticity for endothelial and hepatocyte development by non-invasive lineage tracing. Development 132, 203–213.
- 140 Stojkovic M, Stoljovic P, Leary C et al., 2005, Derivation of a human blastocyst after heterologous nuclear transfer to donated oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11, 226–231.
- 141 Strelchenko N, Kukharenko V, Shkumatov A et al., 2006, Reprogramming of human somatic cells by embryonic stem cell cytoplast. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 12, 107–111.
- 142 Strong C, 2005, The ethics of human cloning. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10 (Suppl.) 1, 45–49.
- 143 Surani MAH, 2002, Immaculate nonconception. Nature 416, 491–493.
- 144 Surani MAH, Allen ND, Barton SC et al., 1990, Developmental consequences of imprinting of paternal chromosomes by DNA methylation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London (Biology) 326, 313–327.
- 145 Szeto IY, Barton SC, Keverne EB, Surani AM, 2004, Analysis of imprinted murine Peg3 locus in transgenic mice. Mammalian Genome 15, 284–295
- 146 Takahashi K, Yamanaka S, 2006, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676.
- 147 Takaoka K, Yamamoto M, Shiratori H et al., 2006, The mouse embryo autonomously acquires anterior-posterior polarity at implantation. Developmental Cell 10, 451–459.
- 148 Takeuchi T, Palermo G, 2004, Clinical prospects of nuclear transfer and somatic cell haploidization: implications of cloning technique for reproductive medicine. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 8, 509–515.
- 149 Tang F, Hajkova P, Barton SC et al., 2006, MicroRNA expression profiling of single whole embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Research 24, 34.
- 150 Tarkowski AK, Balakier H, 1980, Nucleo-cytoplasmic interactions in cell hybrids between mouse oocytes, blastomeres and somatic cells. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 55, 319–330.
- 151 Tesarik J, Nagy ZP, Sousa M et al., 2001, Fertilizable oocytes reconstructed from patient's somatic cell nuclei and donor ooplasts. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2, 160–164.
- 152 Thornton JM, 2001, Protein structures, inherited mutations and disease. In: Abstract PS02, Eleventh International Congress of Human Genetics, Vienna.
- 153 Tolkunova E, Cavaleri F, Eckardt S et al., 2006, The caudal-related protein Cdx2 promotes trophoblast differentiation on mouse ES cells. Stem Cells 24, 139–144.
- 154 Unwin RD, Smith DL, Blinco D et al., 2006, Quantitative proteonomics reveals posttranslational control as a regulatory factor in primary hemopoietic stem cells. Blood 107, 4687–4694.
- 155 Van Blerkom J, Barton SC, Johnson MH, 1976, Molecular differentiation in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Nature 259, 319–321.
- 156 Verdel A, Jia S, Gerber S et al., 2004, RNA-mediated targeting of heterochromatin by the RITS complex. Science 303, 672–676.
- 157 Vinot S, Le Tran, Maro B, Louvet-Vallé S, 2004, Two PAR6 proteins become asymmetrically localized during establishment of polarity in mouse oocytes. Current Biology 14, 520–525.
- 158 Waddington CH, 1943, The epigenotype. Endeavour 1, 18–20.
- 159 Wang X, Willembring H, Akkari Y et al., 2003, Cell fusion is the principle source of bone-marrow derived hepatocytes. Nature 422, 897–901.
- 160 Weismann I, 2005, Stem cell research. Journal of the American Medical Association 294, 1359–1360.
- 161 Wiley LM, Wu J‐X, Harari I, Adamson ED, 1992, Epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein increase after the four-cell preimplantation stage in murine development. Developmental Biology 149, 247–260.
- 162 Wilmut I, Schmeike AE, McWhirter J et al., 1997, Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385, 810–813.
- 163 Wolf SF, Migeon BR, 1985, Clusters of CpG dinucleotides implicated by miclease hypersensitivity as control elements of housekeeping genes. Nature 314, 467–469.
- 164 Wong PMC, Chung SW, Chui DHK, Eaves CJ, 1986, Properties of the earliest clonogenic haematopoietic precursors to appear in the developing murine yolk sac. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 83, 3851–3854.
- 165 Woodbury D, Reynolds K, Black IB, 2002, Adult bone marrow stromal cells express germline, ectodermal, endodermal, and mesodermal genes prior to neurogenesis. Journal of Neuroscience Research 69, 908–917.
- 166 Wu L, de Bruin A, Saavedra HI et al., 2003, Extra-embryonic function of Rb is essential for embryonic development and viability. Nature 421, 942–947.
- 167 Wutz A, Jaenisch R, 2000, A shift from reversible to irreversible inactivation during ES cell differentiation. Molecular Cell 5, 695–705.
- 168 Wutz A, Smzka OW, Barlow DP, 1998, Making sense of imprinting in the mouse, p. 251–263. In: Chadwick DJ, Cardew G (eds) Epigenetics. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
- 169 Xue L, Chen X, Chang Y, Bieker JJ, 2004, Regulatory elements in the EKLF gene that direct erythroid cell-specific expression during mammalian development. Blood 103, 4078–4083.
- 170 Young LE, Fernandes K, McEvoy TG et al., 2001, Sheep embryo culture. Nature Genetics 27, 153–154.
- 171 Zavos PM, 2003, Human reproductive cloning: the time is near. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 397–398.
- 172 Zernicke-Goetz M, 2003, Determining the first cleavage of the mouse oocyte. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6, 160–163.
Editor, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB3 8DB, UK.
* Corresponding author.
# Original publication: Edwards, R.G., 2006. Genetics, epigenetics and gene silencing in differentiating mammalian embryos. Reprod. BioMed. Online 13, 732–753.
1 Paper based on contribution presented at the PGDIS Annual Meeting ‘Nuclear transfer and reprogramming’ in Belize, Central America, February 2–5, 2006.
© 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd., Published by Elsevier B.V.